H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Evgeny Donskoy H2H: 2-0

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez holds a 2–0 lead over Evgeny Donskoy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2015 Chennai round of 32 6-7(3) 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Evgeny Donskoy
RUS Age 36 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #36 6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 Evgeny Donskoy #129 Match data Jan 8, 2015* R32 Chennai ATP 250 Hard
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #68 2-6 6-4 6-3 Evgeny Donskoy #121 Match data Sep 20, 2012* R32 St. Petersburg ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Evgeny Donskoy #1,380 #65 764 1,793 52 113 31.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Evgeny Donskoy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #514 1,469 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #472 1,473 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0 2010 1–2 33.3% #259 1,513 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0 2011 0–2 0.0% #144 1,552 0 0
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2012 0–4 0.0% #81 1,482 0 0
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0 2013 12–19 38.7% #113 1,654 0 0
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0 2014 3–9 25.0% #130 1,546 0 0
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0 2015 5–5 50.0% #91 1,720 0 0
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1 2016 7–19 26.9% #125 1,653 0 0
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2 2017 5–14 26.3% #72 1,623 0 0
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2 2018 14–21 40.0% #97 1,641 0 0
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2 2019 3–6 33.3% #112 1,618 0 0
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2 2020 1–4 20.0% #123 1,540 0 0
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3 2021 1–6 14.3% #172 1,573 0 0
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Evgeny Donskoy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 9 13 22 40.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2015 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2016 4 11 15 26.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2018 10 15 25 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
29 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2019 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2020 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2021 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — 42 78 120 35.0% 6 23 29 20.7% 4 12 16 25.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's and 162/165 of Evgeny Donskoy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Evgeny Donskoy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 1.0 1.0 54.2% 61.5% 45.5% 33.3% — 54.2% 20.0%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 6.0 1.0 42.0% 81.0% 51.7% 57.1% 0.0% 64.0% 28.6%
20 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3% 2010 3/3 6.3 3.0 54.5% 67.1% 48.9% 65.2% 73.9% 58.9% 38.6%
21 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2% 2011 2/2 4.0 2.5 60.9% 72.9% 43.0% 31.3% 14.3% 60.3% 28.6%
22 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1% 2012 4/4 4.0 1.0 60.0% 64.9% 55.3% 52.5% 24.6% 61.1% 30.3%
23 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7% 2013 31/31 5.8 2.5 57.3% 72.2% 49.2% 63.9% 37.8% 62.4% 33.9%
24 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9% 2014 12/12 5.7 2.1 59.7% 70.7% 52.6% 57.9% 33.0% 63.3% 33.6%
25 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9% 2015 10/10 5.1 3.2 58.1% 73.3% 49.4% 61.9% 34.4% 63.4% 36.0%
26 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4% 2016 23/26 5.0 2.2 58.4% 67.7% 50.2% 55.6% 36.7% 60.5% 32.8%
27 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7% 2017 19/19 5.5 2.6 57.5% 71.6% 49.6% 54.2% 26.9% 62.5% 31.9%
28 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8% 2018 35/35 3.6 1.9 60.9% 66.0% 50.9% 62.7% 37.0% 60.3% 34.0%
29 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7% 2019 9/9 6.7 2.2 59.9% 73.9% 43.2% 60.5% 56.7% 61.6% 31.1%
30 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0% 2020 5/5 3.0 4.2 56.7% 68.8% 40.7% 48.5% 35.8% 56.7% 30.5%
31 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0% 2021 7/7 5.3 3.0 55.6% 70.7% 47.0% 53.3% 32.2% 60.2% 28.6%
32 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 650/652 3.6 4.0 58.8% 69.1% 48.7% 55.7% 42.1% 60.6% 37.5% — 162/165 5.0 2.4 58.5% 69.8% 49.4% 58.7% 36.0% 61.3% 33.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Evgeny Donskoy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1483 96.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1469 105.0 -0.44 -0.12 0.436 38.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1474 100.3 -1.05 -1.78 0.794 45.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.02
20 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.27 2010 1513 111.3 +0.09 -0.08 0.938 49.0% — — — 50.0% -0.62 0–2 1–1 — +0.24
21 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 — 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 — -0.99 2011 1552 116.9 -0.88 -2.23 0.722 45.6% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
22 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39 2012 1483 102.2 -1.07 -2.34 0.779 45.7% — — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.09
23 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 — 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42 2013 1654 136.6 -0.81 -1.65 0.902 48.2% +1 -165 -44 43.7% -0.49 4–7 (36%) 6–11 (35%) 100.2 -0.05
24 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03 2014 1546 122.5 -0.84 -1.27 0.914 48.1% +56 — — 37.5% -0.84 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.5 +0.54
25 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38 2015 1721 129.8 -0.73 +0.60 0.984 50.0% +8 — — 52.0% 0.00 0–2 1–2 (33%) — +0.04
26 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24 2016 1653 128.2 -1.90 -3.06 0.831 46.7% -12 -76 -87 35.8% -0.96 2–8 (20%) 6–8 (43%) 95.6 -0.44
27 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40 2017 1624 132.0 -0.67 -3.10 0.850 46.8% +89 -116 — 25.0% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 3–8 (27%) 97.1 +0.25
28 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22 2018 1642 136.4 -2.46 -2.27 0.857 47.6% -9 -50 -129 40.2% -0.85 3–3 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 105.5 -1.64
29 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76 2019 1618 122.8 -1.17 -2.19 0.810 47.4% +6 — — 30.4% -0.65 1–0 2–4 (33%) — +0.32
30 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86 2020 1540 109.2 -2.48 -1.01 0.704 43.9% +38 — — 23.1% -2.16 0–1 1–0 — +0.09
31 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 — 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50 2021 1573 116.3 -1.71 -1.82 0.719 45.4% +29 — — 23.5% -0.94 0–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.06
32 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68 2022 1526 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19 2023 1470 92.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 — 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 — 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2020 1608 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 1586 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28 — 1794 130.1 -1.40 -1.99 0.853 47.4% +16 -96 -87 36.5% -0.89 12–35 (26%) 29–42 (41%) 90.7 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.