H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 1-2

Jeremy Chardy holds a 2–1 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 1–0 on clay, while Jeremy Chardy leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2018 S Hertogenbosch third round 6-4 6-7(7) 7-6(4).

ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 2
3 main draw meetings
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 14, 2018* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R32 Grass Jeremy Chardy #72 6-4 6-7(7) 7-6(4) Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #68 Match data
Oct 30, 2017 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Q2 Q Hard Jeremy Chardy #88 6-3 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #72 Match data
Oct 31, 2012* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jeremy Chardy #34 6-0 6-3 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #70 Match data
Apr 10, 2009* Houston ATP 250 R16 Clay Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #73 6-1 6-0 Jeremy Chardy #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,938 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,595 0 0 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,526 0 0 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,646 0 0 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,757 0 1 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,874 0 2 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,719 0 2 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,740 0 3 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,853 0 5 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,686 0 5 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,747 0 5 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,675 0 5
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,694 0 5 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1