H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Marius Copil H2H: 0-2

Marius Copil holds a 2–0 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marius Copil leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marius Copil won the 2017 Madrid Open first round 7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(9).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Marius Copil
ROU Age 35 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marius Copil #104 7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(9) Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #124 Match data May 9, 2017* R64 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Marius Copil #196 7-6(5) 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #34 Match data Jun 12, 2015* R16 Libéma Open ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Marius Copil #1,021 #56 888 1,810 47 81 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Marius Copil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2009 1–1 50.0% #467 1,444 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #291 1,465 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0 2011 1–2 33.3% #217 1,553 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0 2012 3–3 50.0% #160 1,641 0 0
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2013 1–5 16.7% #147 1,612 0 0
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0 2014 6–6 50.0% #172 1,696 0 0
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0 2015 3–5 37.5% #165 1,677 0 0
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0 2016 3–4 42.9% #132 1,737 0 0
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1 2017 7–14 33.3% #93 1,674 0 0
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2 2018 15–20 42.9% #60 1,808 0 0
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2 2019 7–19 26.9% #153 1,706 0 0
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3 2022 0–1 0.0% #374 1,569 0 0
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Marius Copil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2016 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2019 7 15 22 31.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — 34 48 82 41.5% 7 24 31 22.6% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's and 128/128 of Marius Copil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Marius Copil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 7.0 4.5 48.8% 77.1% 50.6% 64.3% 41.1% 63.5% 42.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 4.0 3.0 50.0% 65.1% 39.5% 69.2% 75.0% 52.3% 37.1%
20 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3% 2011 3/3 7.3 1.7 57.7% 72.6% 48.2% 39.3% 17.4% 62.7% 35.0%
21 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2% 2012 6/6 10.8 1.8 61.8% 77.3% 52.3% 71.7% 37.0% 67.6% 35.5%
22 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1% 2013 6/6 9.0 3.3 56.8% 71.1% 49.4% 60.6% 21.7% 61.7% 28.3%
23 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7% 2014 12/12 10.5 2.0 61.0% 74.0% 52.1% 73.0% 20.2% 64.9% 31.6%
24 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9% 2015 8/8 12.6 3.1 55.1% 75.8% 53.4% 65.9% 41.6% 65.9% 32.6%
25 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9% 2016 7/7 9.6 3.4 58.2% 73.3% 55.7% 43.4% 62.7% 65.6% 36.0%
26 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4% 2017 21/21 10.0 3.5 56.1% 76.0% 51.6% 57.5% 35.5% 65.2% 31.5%
27 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7% 2018 35/35 12.8 3.3 58.9% 77.6% 55.1% 60.6% 37.3% 68.0% 32.3%
28 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8% 2019 26/26 11.3 3.4 57.2% 73.3% 48.8% 56.4% 35.6% 62.9% 30.3%
29 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0% 2022 1/1 11.0 2.0 62.8% 76.3% 57.1% 50.0% 0.0% 69.1% 26.3%
32 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 650/652 3.6 4.0 58.8% 69.1% 48.7% 55.7% 42.1% 60.6% 37.5% — 128/128 11.1 3.1 57.8% 75.2% 52.2% 59.8% 35.6% 65.3% 32.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Marius Copil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1483 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1460 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1444 105.1 -0.74 -2.41 1.162 53.2% — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 1–0 — +0.17
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1466 107.9 -1.19 -1.58 0.779 45.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.14
20 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.27 2011 1554 115.1 +0.38 -3.10 0.938 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.06
21 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 — 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 — -0.99 2012 1641 121.6 +2.57 -0.78 1.093 51.3% -2 — — 50.0% +0.07 1–1 1–1 — -0.32
22 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39 2013 1613 118.9 -0.92 -2.99 0.739 45.9% — — — 21.4% -1.43 1–1 0–1 — -0.16
23 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 — 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42 2014 1696 129.0 +0.87 -2.43 0.901 48.2% +34 -125 — 48.1% -0.26 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 102.3 -0.33
24 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03 2015 1678 122.4 +0.84 -1.99 0.956 49.4% +42 — -45 42.9% -0.19 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 -0.66
25 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38 2016 1737 124.6 +1.66 -1.66 1.047 50.6% +26 — — 50.0% -0.35 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.30
26 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24 2017 1674 138.4 +1.25 -2.84 0.905 48.3% +64 -66 — 37.0% -0.76 3–4 (43%) 8–8 (50%) 100.4 +0.06
27 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40 2018 1809 146.2 +2.98 -2.62 1.009 50.1% +33 -205 -181 48.2% -0.07 3–9 (25%) 14–11 (56%) 99.8 -0.13
28 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22 2019 1706 138.7 -0.25 -4.35 0.816 47.1% +48 -145 — 35.1% -1.07 5–7 (42%) 8–5 (62%) 102.2 -1.18
29 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76 2020 1665 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86 2021 1582 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 — 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50 2022 1570 106.2 -3.65 +1.03 0.851 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.07
32 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19 2024 1557 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 — 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 — 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2020 1608 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 1586 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28 — 1811 134.7 +1.23 -2.80 0.926 48.8% +41 -127 -136 41.5% -0.53 17–30 (36%) 39–34 (53%) 101.1 -2.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.