H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Mischa Zverev H2H: 1-2

Mischa Zverev holds a 2–1 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Mischa Zverev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mischa Zverev won the 2017 Australian Open first round 6-3 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Mischa Zverev
GER Age 39 Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mischa Zverev #50 6-3 7-6(5) 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #74 Match data Jan 18, 2017* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Mischa Zverev #45 6-2 6-4 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #53 Match data Jul 16, 2009* R32 Stuttgart Open ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #64 6-4 3-6 6-0 Mischa Zverev #99 Match data Sep 11, 2008* R32 Tiriac Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Mischa Zverev #1,373 #25 1,664 2,007 134 199 40.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Mischa Zverev
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2006 3–3 50.0% #151 1,529 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2007 6–8 42.9% #88 1,606 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0 2008 18–23 43.9% #80 1,710 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0 2009 15–24 38.5% #78 1,630 0 0
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2010 14–18 43.8% #82 1,675 0 0
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0 2011 2–18 10.0% #211 1,494 0 0
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0 2012 0–3 0.0% #159 1,608 0 0
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0 2013 4–5 44.4% #176 1,638 0 0
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2 2015 7–8 46.7% #171 1,840 0 0
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2 2016 12–14 46.2% #51 1,916 0 0
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2 2017 30–31 49.2% #33 1,850 0 0
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2 2018 19–29 39.6% #69 1,685 0 1
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3 2019 3–12 20.0% #281 1,572 0 1
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5 2020 1–2 33.3% #264 1,568 0 1
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5 2021 0–1 0.0% #346 1,522 0 1
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Mischa Zverev
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
20 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 12 12 24 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
21 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 6 14 20 30.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 11 11 22 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 1 8 9 11.1% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — —
24 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2013 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2015 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 11 10 21 52.4% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 18 19 37 48.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
30 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2018 7 18 25 28.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
31 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2019 1 4 5 20.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
32 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2020 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — 79 114 193 40.9% 25 54 79 31.6% 30 30 60 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's and 328/333 of Mischa Zverev's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Mischa Zverev
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 6/6 6.8 1.3 70.7% 71.2% 46.2% 58.2% 49.7% 63.9% 31.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 14/14 5.1 2.1 61.6% 67.2% 50.3% 58.5% 37.5% 61.1% 37.3%
20 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3% 2008 37/41 4.6 1.4 66.7% 68.6% 50.2% 58.3% 36.2% 62.2% 35.2%
21 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2% 2009 39/39 4.5 1.9 63.4% 68.0% 49.5% 64.7% 42.3% 61.6% 36.0%
22 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1% 2010 31/32 3.5 2.2 66.3% 66.5% 46.8% 50.4% 38.5% 59.6% 35.1%
23 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7% 2011 20/20 2.0 1.8 64.3% 60.1% 46.8% 53.8% 42.6% 55.3% 33.2%
24 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9% 2012 3/3 6.3 3.7 58.7% 62.8% 44.1% 52.4% 34.5% 55.2% 35.9%
25 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9% 2013 9/9 3.7 2.8 67.3% 64.3% 42.0% 41.6% 38.3% 57.1% 35.7%
26 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7% 2015 15/15 7.1 1.8 67.5% 68.9% 50.7% 63.6% 34.2% 63.4% 34.5%
28 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8% 2016 26/26 5.2 2.0 64.7% 73.1% 52.8% 59.2% 43.3% 65.8% 38.1%
29 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7% 2017 61/61 6.4 2.7 65.2% 71.5% 50.5% 62.7% 45.4% 64.1% 33.9%
30 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0% 2018 48/48 5.5 2.4 59.6% 71.3% 49.0% 57.0% 35.0% 62.2% 36.2%
31 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0% 2019 15/15 4.3 2.7 64.4% 64.1% 43.7% 58.5% 27.5% 57.0% 28.0%
32 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7% 2020 3/3 2.0 2.7 62.3% 68.9% 51.4% 55.0% 33.5% 62.4% 33.2%
33 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1% 2021 1/1 5.0 2.0 57.1% 63.5% 43.6% 50.0% 44.4% 54.9% 38.8%
34 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 650/652 3.6 4.0 58.8% 69.1% 48.7% 55.7% 42.1% 60.6% 37.5% — 328/333 5.0 2.2 64.3% 68.7% 49.0% 58.4% 39.5% 61.7% 35.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Mischa Zverev
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1530 115.8 +0.34 -1.37 0.883 47.7% +10 — — 53.3% -0.33 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 102.6 +0.06
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1607 116.8 -1.19 -0.21 0.960 49.3% -7 — +18 38.9% -0.53 3–1 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 -0.28
20 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.27 2008 1710 130.6 -0.67 -1.51 0.931 48.5% +11 -218 -40 48.4% -0.28 5–9 (36%) 6–11 (35%) 95.4 -0.70
21 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 — 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 — -0.99 2009 1631 136.9 -1.54 -0.05 0.938 49.1% -40 -24 +85 42.9% -0.23 9–9 (50%) 5–9 (36%) 96.5 -1.09
22 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39 2010 1676 123.2 -3.33 -0.90 0.868 47.4% +17 -183 +32 40.6% -0.93 5–2 (71%) 9–3 (75%) 109.2 +0.75
23 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 — 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42 2011 1494 114.1 -4.27 -2.53 0.741 44.2% +80 -81 +114 18.4% -2.12 1–5 (17%) 2–3 (40%) 94.7 -0.49
24 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03 2012 1608 128.0 -1.03 -1.71 0.801 46.0% — — — 22.2% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — -0.34
25 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38 2013 1639 122.4 -3.28 -0.27 0.834 46.7% +34 — +13 42.9% -0.67 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 101.9 +0.46
26 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24 2014 1561 110.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40 2015 1840 138.3 -0.20 +0.40 0.943 48.8% -46 — -30 45.9% -0.19 4–3 (57%) 8–8 (50%) 103.7 -1.92
28 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22 2016 1916 147.9 +1.33 +2.10 1.114 51.4% +45 -348 — 50.8% +0.49 2–6 (25%) 5–11 (31%) 93.6 +0.12
29 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76 2017 1851 155.7 +0.36 -1.01 0.943 49.0% +5 -186 -5 49.4% -0.13 12–8 (60%) 11–16 (41%) 101.5 -2.26
30 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86 2018 1686 141.4 -1.71 -0.03 0.956 48.9% -37 +19 +171 45.7% -0.27 5–11 (31%) 7–10 (41%) 92.2 +0.05
31 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 — 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50 2019 1572 115.7 -3.93 -5.33 0.650 43.0% +27 +27 +220 12.9% -2.61 — 1–1 — +0.08
32 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68 2020 1569 116.2 -1.52 +0.52 0.884 47.5% +30 — — 33.3% -0.33 — 0–1 — -0.12
33 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19 2021 1522 101.7 -1.33 +1.31 0.862 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.11
34 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 — 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 — 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2020 1608 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 1586 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28 — 2007 139.5 -1.26 -0.72 0.912 48.3% +4 -113 +63 42.8% -0.48 49–59 (45%) 64–79 (45%) 96.9 -1.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.