H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 2-1

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez holds a 2–1 lead over Thiemo de Bakker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Garcia-Lopez won the 2016 Roland Garros first round 6-4 6-4 5-7 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Thiemo de Bakker
NED Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #51 6-4 6-4 5-7 7-6(3) Thiemo de Bakker #120 Match data May 24, 2016* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #29 6-2 6-3 Thiemo de Bakker #83 Match data May 4, 2011* R32 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay
Thiemo de Bakker #50 6-3 3-6 7-6(5) 7-5 Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #40 Match data May 27, 2010* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez #1,009 #23 1,465 1,939 299 353 45.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Thiemo de Bakker #1,382 #40 1,010 1,853 54 80 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Thiemo de Bakker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 1–1 50.0% #464 1,512 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 1–4 20.0% #444 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 1–1 50.0% #249 1,531 0 0
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #244 1,497 0 0 2009 2–3 40.0% #96 1,612 0 0
21 2004 5–7 41.7% #129 1,578 0 0 2010 26–23 53.1% #43 1,763 0 0
22 2005 19–26 42.2% #91 1,589 0 0 2011 2–11 15.4% #223 1,665 0 0
23 2006 15–20 42.9% #68 1,596 0 0 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,642 0 0
24 2007 13–22 37.1% #90 1,527 0 0 2013 7–10 41.2% #146 1,683 0 0
25 2008 22–22 50.0% #62 1,634 0 0 2014 7–6 53.8% #144 1,665 0 0
26 2009 28–27 50.9% #41 1,758 0 1 2015 2–5 28.6% #99 1,617 0 0
27 2010 31–23 57.4% #33 1,873 0 2 2016 5–12 29.4% #257 1,582 0 0
28 2011 20–29 40.8% #65 1,712 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2012 20–25 44.4% #76 1,718 0 2 2018 0–1 0.0% #242 1,558 0 0
30 2013 20–21 48.8% #62 1,774 0 2 2019 0–1 0.0% #511 1,536 0 0
31 2014 25–26 49.0% #36 1,741 0 3 — — — — — — —
32 2015 32–25 56.1% #27 1,843 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2016 22–31 41.5% #70 1,685 0 5 — — — — — — —
34 2017 5–15 25.0% #70 1,746 0 5 — — — — — — —
35 2018 16–23 41.0% #105 1,676 0 5 — — — — — — —
36 2019 6–10 37.5% #144 1,695 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Thiemo de Bakker
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2005 5 8 13 38.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 1 6 7 14.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
23 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 7 9 16 43.8% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
25 2008 12 13 25 48.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2014 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2009 12 16 28 42.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 12 8 20 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2016 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
28 2011 11 17 28 39.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2019 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 16 11 27 59.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 20 16 36 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9 18 27 33.3% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 3 9 12 25.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 5 7 12 41.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 133 181 314 42.4% 136 138 274 49.6% 29 31 60 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — 27 45 72 37.5% 20 24 44 45.5% 7 11 18 38.9% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 650/652 of Guillermo Garcia-Lopez's and 133/134 of Thiemo de Bakker's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 3.5 3.0 54.6% 74.1% 49.1% 72.9% 41.7% 62.8% 39.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/5 8.2 1.2 65.7% 71.8% 58.9% 57.1% 49.6% 67.3% 25.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 7.5 1.0 55.0% 73.1% 56.3% 68.6% 31.3% 66.0% 34.0%
20 2003 1/1 6.0 1.0 49.4% 68.4% 43.6% 72.7% 100.0% 55.8% 33.3% 2009 5/5 5.8 1.4 62.2% 70.1% 51.0% 61.2% 36.1% 62.1% 36.0%
21 2004 12/12 2.3 2.7 60.3% 65.8% 47.8% 45.3% 51.7% 58.8% 38.2% 2010 49/49 9.8 1.6 61.0% 73.7% 53.5% 60.8% 41.7% 65.8% 35.9%
22 2005 45/45 2.6 3.4 64.8% 65.4% 47.4% 56.8% 44.2% 59.3% 39.1% 2011 13/13 6.5 2.8 54.5% 68.0% 48.7% 53.9% 21.4% 59.2% 28.0%
23 2006 35/35 4.3 3.6 60.5% 66.9% 48.1% 55.6% 38.0% 59.4% 37.7% 2012 2/2 5.0 1.0 55.3% 60.2% 42.0% 48.5% 100.0% 52.1% 28.9%
24 2007 35/35 3.0 2.4 63.4% 67.6% 45.5% 53.1% 46.7% 59.5% 36.9% 2013 17/17 6.2 2.0 60.6% 69.6% 45.6% 62.0% 41.5% 60.2% 34.7%
25 2008 43/44 2.7 4.7 59.5% 66.3% 47.2% 56.1% 39.1% 58.4% 36.9% 2014 12/13 8.7 2.2 57.1% 77.0% 47.1% 64.2% 26.3% 64.1% 33.6%
26 2009 55/55 3.0 4.7 61.0% 68.6% 48.2% 54.7% 42.0% 60.8% 39.4% 2015 7/7 9.0 2.0 54.3% 74.6% 49.2% 59.1% 37.8% 63.0% 34.9%
27 2010 54/54 4.6 3.4 60.4% 71.3% 52.9% 53.6% 43.9% 63.7% 38.7% 2016 17/17 7.2 1.5 60.3% 70.5% 47.1% 49.0% 36.1% 61.3% 33.8%
28 2011 49/49 3.7 4.7 56.4% 68.9% 47.6% 50.9% 44.4% 59.8% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 45/45 3.6 4.1 57.7% 67.9% 49.7% 61.6% 41.6% 59.8% 37.7% 2018 1/1 4.0 3.0 71.7% 60.6% 15.4% 33.3% — 47.8% 15.8%
30 2013 41/41 3.4 4.6 55.2% 70.1% 47.3% 56.2% 41.7% 59.9% 38.0% 2019 1/1 9.0 4.0 58.2% 68.8% 17.4% 69.2% — 47.3% 21.4%
31 2014 51/51 3.6 3.8 57.3% 69.0% 48.2% 53.9% 42.7% 60.0% 39.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 56/57 4.9 3.8 54.9% 73.3% 49.6% 57.4% 44.8% 62.9% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 53/53 4.0 3.9 56.2% 71.2% 49.3% 57.5% 36.2% 61.5% 36.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 20/20 3.1 4.4 54.7% 67.9% 46.4% 56.8% 39.8% 58.1% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 39/39 3.5 4.6 60.5% 70.9% 50.0% 55.4% 43.0% 62.5% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 16/16 4.4 2.9 61.1% 68.8% 52.7% 63.4% 29.0% 62.6% 31.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 650/652 3.6 4.0 58.8% 69.1% 48.7% 55.7% 42.1% 60.6% 37.5% — 133/134 8.1 1.8 59.5% 72.0% 49.7% 58.8% 37.6% 63.0% 33.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1513 104.7 -0.21 +0.15 1.055 51.5% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — -0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 115.2 -0.81 -3.06 0.782 47.1% — — — 35.7% -0.79 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.08
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1532 107.0 -0.17 -0.92 1.000 50.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
20 2003 1498 111.0 +3.10 +2.69 0.755 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.27 2009 1612 119.7 +1.05 -2.08 0.949 49.0% — — — 41.7% -0.58 1–1 2–2 (50%) — 0.00
21 2004 1578 124.3 -0.99 +0.39 0.927 48.8% -53 +76 — 40.0% -0.23 2–0 0–1 — -0.99 2010 1764 149.9 +1.79 +0.33 1.050 50.7% -70 +14 -122 50.8% +0.25 7–5 (58%) 11–16 (41%) 101.3 +0.27
22 2005 1589 131.8 -2.50 +1.29 0.960 49.2% -21 +56 -7 44.5% -0.20 4–7 (36%) 4–10 (29%) 94.5 -0.39 2011 1665 125.5 -1.60 -4.74 0.686 44.4% -43 +82 — 27.0% -1.97 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.3 -0.54
23 2006 1597 134.1 -2.17 +0.28 0.929 48.6% -13 +48 — 43.2% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 99.7 -0.42 2012 1642 103.3 -3.01 -3.23 0.604 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.03
24 2007 1527 127.2 -3.31 +0.34 0.910 48.2% +38 +53 +43 42.0% -0.61 3–9 (25%) 4–8 (33%) 90.4 +0.03 2013 1684 129.6 -1.39 -1.41 0.871 47.6% -45 +78 -77 37.8% -0.81 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.5 -0.74
25 2008 1634 132.3 -3.43 +0.38 0.889 48.0% -30 +18 -10 47.4% -0.38 8–7 (53%) 9–7 (56%) 103.1 -0.38 2014 1665 127.0 +0.17 -1.17 0.935 48.9% +12 — — 48.1% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.8 +0.61
26 2009 1759 139.8 -1.99 +2.17 1.006 50.0% -99 -39 -12 48.9% +0.11 10–5 (67%) 8–13 (38%) 104.1 -0.24 2015 1618 116.8 +1.14 -1.79 0.944 49.0% — +111 — 41.2% -0.17 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 +0.19
27 2010 1874 147.0 +0.64 +2.00 1.065 51.1% -42 -94 -140 51.9% +0.08 14–8 (64%) 14–11 (56%) 106.3 +0.40 2016 1583 124.7 -1.66 -1.23 0.874 47.5% +82 +70 — 34.9% -1.05 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.4 -0.71
28 2011 1712 143.0 -2.34 -0.22 0.914 48.3% +34 +15 -20 44.0% -0.48 6–9 (40%) 10–12 (45%) 94.5 +1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 1718 140.5 -2.47 -0.31 0.939 49.1% -19 +58 -5 43.0% -0.45 11–7 (61%) 7–6 (54%) 103.3 +0.76 2018 1558 101.5 -1.76 -3.04 0.303 33.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
30 2013 1775 141.6 -3.07 +1.15 0.948 48.9% -63 +53 -70 45.2% -0.29 11–5 (69%) 7–7 (50%) 107.6 -0.86 2019 1536 99.8 +0.16 -1.51 0.406 36.1% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.04
31 2014 1742 146.7 -2.36 +2.20 0.975 49.5% -25 +136 — 47.8% -0.14 13–12 (52%) 7–13 (35%) 95.1 +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1843 154.3 -0.73 +2.76 1.044 50.6% -3 +36 -237 55.3% +0.38 9–10 (47%) 12–14 (46%) 99.6 +1.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1686 149.0 -1.75 -0.29 0.939 48.9% -11 +191 -102 44.3% -0.37 5–9 (36%) 18–9 (67%) 98.9 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1746 137.8 -4.47 -1.59 0.796 46.4% -36 +41 — 34.8% -0.76 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 88.6 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1676 140.7 -0.71 -0.60 0.954 49.0% -33 +102 -51 42.9% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 15–13 (54%) 103.9 -2.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 1695 124.9 -2.06 -2.71 0.827 47.5% +14 +54 — 35.0% -1.05 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 104.5 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2020 1608 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 1586 97.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1940 146.0 -1.99 +0.78 0.953 49.1% -21 +54 -60 45.8% -0.25 111–106 (51%) 129–140 (48%) 99.7 -0.28 — 1854 134.5 +0.13 -1.17 0.910 48.5% -29 +62 -104 41.6% -0.54 18–21 (46%) 33–36 (48%) 101.5 -0.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.