H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Guillermo Perez-Roldan vs Emilio Sanchez H2H: 2-2
Guillermo Perez-Roldan and Emilio Sanchez are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Emilio Sanchez won the 1990 Rome Masters quarterfinal 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 1990* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Emilio Sanchez | 7-6 6-2 | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | Match data |
| Apr 14, 1990* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | 7-5 7-6 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
| Jul 31, 1988* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Emilio Sanchez | 6-3 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | Match data |
| Jul 15, 1988* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | 6-4 6-3 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Perez-Roldan | #1,461 | #13 | 1,222 | 1,932 | 236 | 129 | 64.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | Emilio Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #18 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1989 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #32 | 1,808 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,646 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #82 | 1,755 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #420 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 |