H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Vilas vs Peter Fleming H2H: 4-1

Guillermo Vilas holds a 4–1 lead over Peter Fleming in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Vilas leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Fleming won the 1980 Indian Wells Open quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Vilas
ARG Age 74 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Peter Fleming
USA Age 71 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Peter Fleming #14 6-1 6-4 Guillermo Vilas #6 Match data Feb 16, 1980* QF Indian Wells Open ATP 250 Hard
Guillermo Vilas 7-6 0-6 6-4 Peter Fleming Match data Dec 3, 1977* QF South African Open ATP 250 Hard
Guillermo Vilas #4 6-1 6-7 6-1 Peter Fleming #63 Match data Aug 4, 1977* R16 South Orange ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas #3 6-3 6-3 Peter Fleming #82 Match data Feb 12, 1977* QF Springfield ATP 250 Carpet
Guillermo Vilas #4 6-2 3-6 6-3 Peter Fleming #82 Match data Jan 20, 1977* R32 Baltimore ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Vilas #1,186 #2 47 2,355 890 283 75.9% 4 0 1 3 54 62
Peter Fleming #933 #8 0 2,050 224 214 51.1% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Vilas Peter Fleming
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 3–3 50.0% — 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 2–4 33.3% — 1,533 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,495 0 0
18 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 1973 1–2 33.3% — 1,492 0 0
19 1972 18–15 54.5% — 1,691 0 0 1974 0–2 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
20 1973 24–14 63.2% #31 1,854 0 1 1975 6–7 46.2% #120 1,542 0 0
21 1974 87–21 80.6% #5 2,175 0 8 1976 15–14 51.7% #116 1,636 0 0
22 1975 87–18 82.9% #2 2,134 0 13 1977 31–28 52.5% #47 1,816 0 0
23 1976 82–20 80.4% #6 2,104 0 19 1978 43–31 58.1% #26 1,955 0 1
24 1977 128–15 89.5% #3 2,340 2 35 1979 45–26 63.4% #13 1,920 0 3
25 1978 61–8 88.4% #3 2,234 3 42 1980 21–19 52.5% #37 1,769 0 3
26 1979 70–22 76.1% #6 2,092 4 46 1981 9–13 40.9% #99 1,734 0 3
27 1980 62–18 77.5% #4 2,038 4 49 1982 2–6 25.0% — 1,654 0 3
28 1981 62–16 79.5% #6 2,035 4 52 1983 14–11 56.0% #32 1,765 0 3
29 1982 70–16 81.4% #4 2,016 4 59 1984 18–19 48.6% #51 1,735 0 3
30 1983 51–17 75.0% #11 1,949 4 62 1985 9–12 42.9% #94 1,686 0 3
31 1984 17–14 54.8% #28 1,792 4 62 1986 6–10 37.5% #103 1,657 0 3
32 1985 17–14 54.8% #39 1,768 4 62 1987 4–13 23.5% #174 1,561 0 3
33 1986 18–12 60.0% #22 1,760 4 62 — — — — — — —
34 1987 16–13 55.2% #71 1,718 4 62 — — — — — — —
35 1988 11–15 42.3% #126 1,630 4 62 — — — — — — —
36 1989 2–4 33.3% #408 1,601 4 62 — — — — — — —
39 1992 0–2 0.0% #463 1,577 4 62 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Vilas Peter Fleming
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1968 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1972 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 23 12 35 65.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1974 7 3 10 70.0% 63 10 73 86.3% 12 3 15 80.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1976 4 3 7 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 71 11 82 86.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 1977 11 8 19 57.9% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 14 8 22 63.6%
23 1976 9 3 12 75.0% 47 9 56 83.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 19 6 25 76.0% 1978 20 11 31 64.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 16 9 25 64.0%
24 1977 16 2 18 88.9% 90 5 95 94.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 1979 20 7 27 74.1% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 23 12 35 65.7%
25 1978 11 2 13 84.6% 39 4 43 90.7% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 1980 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
26 1979 14 5 19 73.7% 30 7 37 81.1% 16 2 18 88.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 1981 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 1980 13 5 18 72.2% 38 6 44 86.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1982 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 55 9 64 85.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1982 10 3 13 76.9% 42 5 47 89.4% — — — — 18 8 26 69.2% 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
30 1983 8 3 11 72.7% 35 10 45 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1985 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
31 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
32 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — — 1987 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 105 47 152 69.1% 630 164 794 79.3% 70 27 97 72.2% 85 45 130 65.4% — 94 77 171 55.0% 22 36 58 37.9% 18 27 45 40.0% 90 74 164 54.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Vilas Peter Fleming
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1968 1507 101.4 — — — — — — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 1548 110.0 — — — — — +33 — 52.4% 0.00 2–2 (50%) — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1533 100.6 — — — — — +32 — 35.3% -1.24 1–1 — — +0.31 1972 1495 104.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04
18 1971 1538 109.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.32 1973 1493 101.0 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.13
19 1972 1692 117.2 — — — — -135 +67 -207 50.6% -0.02 5–2 (71%) 4–2 (67%) — +2.75 1974 1486 109.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — -0.26
20 1973 1855 142.4 — — — — — +66 — 60.5% +0.49 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — -1.97 1975 1542 115.0 — — — — +62 -29 — 50.0% +0.04 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +1.11
21 1974 2176 163.1 — — — — -398 +81 -339 74.5% +1.75 14–7 (67%) 6–7 (46%) — -3.67 1976 1637 132.6 — — — — -4 -61 -52 53.7% +0.48 3–6 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — +2.59
22 1975 2135 164.8 — — — — -238 +124 -236 77.3% +1.83 11–4 (73%) 9–3 (75%) — -2.26 1977 1816 148.6 — — — — +64 -251 -244 52.9% +0.24 12–15 (44%) 11–15 (42%) — -2.07
23 1976 2105 166.1 — — — — -55 +141 -116 74.3% +1.65 16–8 (67%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.39 1978 1956 158.7 — — — — +60 -329 -387 55.4% +0.43 19–14 (58%) 11–15 (42%) — -4.63
24 1977 2341 167.8 — — — — -130 +71 -360 81.4% +2.13 26–4 (87%) 24–9 (73%) — -0.99 1979 1920 159.8 — — — — +93 -345 -335 60.1% +0.60 10–7 (59%) 5–13 (28%) — -0.84
25 1978 2235 162.9 — — — — -67 +127 -120 78.4% +1.95 12–4 (75%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.26 1980 1770 138.7 — — — — +76 -207 -83 52.3% +0.24 5–6 (45%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.13
26 1979 2092 163.4 — — — — -76 +212 +65 70.9% +1.36 12–5 (71%) 18–12 (60%) — -2.83 1981 1735 139.0 — — — — +22 — -40 41.5% -0.53 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -2.84
27 1980 2039 168.7 — — — — -56 +181 +106 72.7% +1.73 9–9 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — -3.22 1982 1654 112.6 — — — — +28 — — 33.3% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.44
28 1981 2035 170.3 — — — — -90 +159 +3 73.8% +1.88 7–3 (70%) 7–7 (50%) — -1.85 1983 1766 140.3 — — — — +9 — -91 55.4% +0.31 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.68
29 1982 2016 167.5 — — — — -29 +191 — 75.6% +1.84 9–4 (69%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.32 1984 1735 141.3 — — — — +24 -182 — 47.9% +0.03 8–7 (53%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.15
30 1983 1949 163.8 — — — — +35 +145 — 72.0% +1.60 7–4 (64%) 11–7 (61%) — -1.46 1985 1686 134.6 — — — — +30 — — 50.9% -0.14 1–7 (13%) 5–1 (83%) — -0.10
31 1984 1792 143.4 — — — — +81 +158 — 51.9% +0.31 7–3 (70%) 7–6 (54%) — -1.09 1986 1657 132.9 — — — — +2 — — 41.5% -0.63 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
32 1985 1768 139.4 — — — — +33 +113 — 54.1% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.45 1987 1561 118.4 — — — — +12 — +36 32.6% -1.12 0–5 (0%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.55
33 1986 1761 144.2 — — — — — +100 — 56.1% +0.62 7–4 (64%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 1718 134.7 — — — — — +82 — 55.1% +0.29 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — -1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 1631 131.2 — — — — — +67 — 45.3% -0.17 3–7 (30%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 1602 104.5 — — — — — +40 — 33.3% -1.53 1–1 1–0 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1992 1578 103.1 -2.21 -0.58 0.910 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2355 165.4 -2.21 -0.58 0.910 47.9% -88 +121 -141 70.6% +1.44 160–88 (65%) 154–116 (57%) 100.3 -2.17 — 2050 152.1 — — — — +50 -216 -151 51.5% +0.14 73–84 (46%) 73–84 (46%) 95.4 -1.76

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.