H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Gustavo Kuerten vs Francisco Clavet H2H: 3-3

Gustavo Kuerten and Francisco Clavet are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Clavet won the 2000 Sydney third round 6-4 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gustavo Kuerten
BRA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Francisco Clavet
ESP Age 57 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 13, 2000* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Francisco Clavet #39 6-4 3-6 6-4 Gustavo Kuerten #5 Match data
May 13, 1999* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Gustavo Kuerten #14 6-3 6-3 Francisco Clavet #21 Match data
Aug 28, 1998* Long Island ATP 250 R16 Hard Gustavo Kuerten #27 2-6 6-3 7-6(8) Francisco Clavet #28 Match data
Jul 10, 1998* Gstaad ATP 250 R16 Clay Francisco Clavet #29 2-6 6-4 6-4 Gustavo Kuerten #27 Match data
Apr 23, 1998* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Gustavo Kuerten #9 7-5 7-5 Francisco Clavet #44 Match data
Apr 11, 1997* Estoril ATP 250 R16 Clay Francisco Clavet #35 1-6 6-1 7-6(5) Gustavo Kuerten #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gustavo Kuerten #1,132 #1 4,750 2,140 336 182 64.9% 3 5 1 0 11 20
Francisco Clavet #911 #18 1,613 1,869 388 340 53.3% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Francisco Clavet
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1996 8–10 44.4% #88 1,556 0 0 1988 1–4 20.0% #290 1,459 0 0
20 1997 34–23 59.6% #14 1,779 1 1 1989 5–6 45.5% #188 1,503 0 0
21 1998 39–24 61.9% #23 1,781 1 3 1990 11–15 42.3% #90 1,576 0 1
22 1999 47–24 66.2% #5 1,860 1 5 1991 38–26 59.4% #30 1,753 0 1
23 2000 59–18 76.6% #1 2,012 2 10 1992 39–29 57.4% #22 1,757 0 1
24 2001 57–17 77.0% #2 1,915 3 16 1993 21–26 44.7% #100 1,661 0 1
25 2002 24–14 63.2% #37 1,874 3 17 1994 27–19 58.7% #38 1,795 0 1
26 2003 40–19 67.8% #16 1,854 3 19 1995 31–27 53.4% #49 1,740 0 2
27 2004 23–12 65.7% #40 1,834 3 20 1996 37–28 56.9% #34 1,742 0 3
28 2005 3–9 25.0% #291 1,714 3 20 1997 41–24 63.1% #33 1,832 0 5
29 2006 0–1 0.0% #1078 1,689 3 20 1998 43–26 62.3% #30 1,809 0 7
30 2007 2–7 22.2% #680 1,601 3 20 1999 30–27 52.6% #38 1,701 0 7
31 2008 0–4 0.0% #1150 1,560 3 20 2000 28–30 48.3% #49 1,627 0 7
32 — — — — — — — 2001 23–27 46.0% #51 1,620 0 8
33 — — — — — — — 2002 11–22 33.3% #113 1,564 0 8
34 — — — — — — — 2003 2–4 33.3% #358 1,567 0 8