H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 01:16 UTC
Gustavo Kuerten vs Jiri Vanek H2H: 1-0
Gustavo Kuerten holds a 1–0 lead over Jiri Vanek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gustavo Kuerten leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gustavo Kuerten won the 2001 Buenos Aires fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2001* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Gustavo Kuerten | 6-2 6-4 | Jiri Vanek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gustavo Kuerten | #1,132 | #1 | 4,750 | 2,140 | 336 | 182 | 64.9% | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 20 |
| Jiri Vanek | #1,543 | #74 | 796 | 1,644 | 67 | 120 | 35.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gustavo Kuerten | Jiri Vanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #495 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #14 | 1,779 | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,781 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,860 | 1 | 5 | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #77 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #1 | 2,012 | 2 | 10 | 2001 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 1,915 | 3 | 16 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #199 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,874 | 3 | 17 | 2003 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #143 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #16 | 1,854 | 3 | 19 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #115 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #40 | 1,834 | 3 | 20 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #99 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #291 | 1,714 | 3 | 20 | 2006 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #102 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1078 | 1,689 | 3 | 20 | 2007 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #101 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #680 | 1,601 | 3 | 20 | 2008 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #124 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1150 | 1,560 | 3 | 20 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |