H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Guy Forget vs Ilie Nastase H2H: 1-0
Guy Forget holds a 1–0 lead over Ilie Nastase in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guy Forget leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guy Forget won the 1982 Roland Garros second round 6-1 5-7 6-4 1-6 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 79
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1982* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Guy Forget | 6-1 5-7 6-4 1-6 9-7 | Ilie Nastase | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guy Forget | #1,367 | #4 | 2,392 | 2,038 | 356 | 279 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Ilie Nastase | #1,075 | #1 | 0 | 2,260 | 859 | 331 | 72.2% | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 55 | 64 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guy Forget | Ilie Nastase | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #94 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #61 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 41–14 | 74.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1988 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 60–20 | 75.0% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1989 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 73–13 | 84.9% | — | 2,079 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | 1990 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1972 | 106–20 | 84.1% | — | 2,157 | 1 | 25 |
| 26 | 1991 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 | 1973 | 118–17 | 87.4% | #1 | 2,208 | 2 | 41 |
| 27 | 1992 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,978 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 80–21 | 79.2% | #10 | 2,153 | 2 | 48 |
| 28 | 1993 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,861 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 91–21 | 81.2% | #7 | 2,170 | 2 | 54 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 76–17 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,179 | 2 | 59 |
| 30 | 1995 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,092 | 2 | 62 |
| 31 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #51 | 1,690 | 0 | 11 | 1978 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #16 | 2,059 | 2 | 64 |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #1121 | 1,599 | 0 | 11 | 1979 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #49 | 1,795 | 2 | 64 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #77 | 1,740 | 2 | 64 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #74 | 1,730 | 2 | 64 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,633 | 2 | 64 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #118 | 1,595 | 2 | 64 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #202 | 1,574 | 2 | 64 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #431 | 1,535 | 2 | 64 |