H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Hamad Medjedovic vs Daniel Elahi Galan H2H: 0-1
Daniel Elahi Galan holds a 1–0 lead over Hamad Medjedovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniel Elahi Galan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Elahi Galan won the 2024 Kitzbuhel third round 6-4 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Colombia
Age 30
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2024* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Daniel Elahi Galan | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | Hamad Medjedovic | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2024 | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Daniel Elahi Galan | 6-4 2-6 6-2 | Hamad Medjedovic | Match data |
| Apr 19, 2021 | Belgrade | ATP 250 | Q1 | Clay | Hamad Medjedovic | 7-6(4) 7-6(5) | Daniel Elahi Galan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hamad Medjedovic | #69 | #56 | 950 | 1,822 | 41 | 44 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Elahi Galan | #304 | #56 | 863 | 1,777 | 45 | 73 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hamad Medjedovic | Daniel Elahi Galan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #669 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #427 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #113 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #191 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #81 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #120 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #69 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #67 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #93 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |