H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Hamad Medjedovic vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 1-0
Hamad Medjedovic holds a 1–0 lead over Dominic Thiem in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hamad Medjedovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hamad Medjedovic won the 2023 Gstaad fourth round 7-5 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2023* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Hamad Medjedovic | 7-5 2-6 6-3 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hamad Medjedovic | #69 | #56 | 950 | 1,822 | 41 | 44 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hamad Medjedovic | Dominic Thiem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #669 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #113 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #81 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 |
| 2026 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #69 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 |