H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Harel Levy vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 0-1

Lukas Lacko holds a 1–0 lead over Harel Levy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lukas Lacko won the 2009 Halle Open first round 7-6(6) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Harel Levy
ISR Age 48 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukas Lacko #217 7-6(6) 6-2 Harel Levy #231 Match data Jun 11, 2009* R32 Halle Open ATP 250 Grass
Harel Levy #231 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 Lukas Lacko #217 Match data Jun 9, 2009* Q3 Q Halle Open ATP 250 Grass
Harel Levy #256 7-6(6) 6-2 Lukas Lacko #167 Match data May 28, 2007 Q1 Q Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Harel Levy #1,024 #30 1,023 1,733 43 83 34.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Harel Levy Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1998 3–2 60.0% #224 1,531 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 1999 1–1 50.0% #183 1,555 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2000 13–17 43.3% #59 1,644 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2001 15–25 37.5% #78 1,561 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2002 3–10 23.1% #252 1,529 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2003 2–6 25.0% #111 1,478 0 0 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2004 5–13 27.8% #247 1,444 0 0 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2006 0–2 0.0% #286 1,502 0 0 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2007 0–1 0.0% #161 1,480 0 0 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2008 0–3 0.0% #248 1,524 0 0 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2009 0–1 0.0% #119 1,569 0 0 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2010 1–2 33.3% #342 1,529 0 0 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Harel Levy Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1998 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 11 12 23 47.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2001 6 14 20 30.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2004 4 5 9 44.4% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2009 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 28 50 78 35.9% 8 20 28 28.6% 6 10 16 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 116/126 of Harel Levy's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Harel Levy Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1998 5/5 3.4 2.0 52.8% 74.0% 57.3% 64.4% 39.0% 66.3% 36.8% 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 1999 2/2 3.5 2.0 64.7% 65.8% 48.7% 71.5% 52.4% 59.8% 41.6% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2000 28/30 3.5 2.1 55.3% 69.7% 48.7% 53.1% 44.3% 60.1% 38.9% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2001 32/40 4.7 1.8 59.1% 71.4% 47.3% 55.3% 41.4% 61.4% 37.4% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2002 13/13 3.5 3.6 57.9% 63.6% 38.4% 52.0% 34.7% 52.9% 33.3% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2003 8/8 1.8 0.4 59.3% 65.7% 48.7% 47.7% 31.0% 58.9% 36.0% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2004 18/18 4.3 1.3 58.9% 66.2% 45.4% 61.0% 36.3% 58.0% 31.5% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2006 2/2 1.5 2.5 65.6% 60.9% 49.1% 45.2% 31.3% 56.6% 30.6% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2007 1/1 10.0 2.0 56.7% 71.2% 42.2% 50.0% 50.0% 58.7% 37.6% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2008 3/3 1.7 2.3 57.5% 61.1% 48.8% 53.3% 53.8% 55.6% 31.4% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2009 1/1 6.0 1.0 63.9% 63.0% 38.5% 55.6% 40.0% 54.2% 38.2% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2010 3/3 5.3 1.0 62.9% 85.0% 56.5% 30.0% 37.5% 74.0% 33.2% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
Career — 116/126 3.9 1.9 58.0% 68.8% 47.1% 54.5% 40.1% 59.6% 36.0% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Harel Levy Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1531 111.5 +0.44 -0.15 1.092 51.0% +35 — — 58.3% +0.58 1–1 0–1 — +0.62 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 1999 1555 115.8 +2.47 +1.12 1.035 51.0% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.45 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2000 1644 133.8 -1.55 +0.58 0.976 49.2% -17 — +5 42.9% -0.31 6–4 (60%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.27 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2001 1562 129.8 -0.57 +0.25 0.968 49.4% -37 +39 +82 41.3% -0.37 5–6 (45%) 6–13 (32%) — +0.37 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2002 1530 108.4 -4.47 -3.36 0.707 43.4% -5 — +69 28.6% -1.71 1–0 2–3 (40%) — -0.29 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2003 1478 106.2 -2.04 -0.16 0.875 47.0% -38 +95 — 36.8% -1.16 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.38 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2004 1444 108.0 -3.10 -4.03 0.750 45.4% +35 +67 — 31.0% -1.33 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.37 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2005 1444 99.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2006 1502 106.6 -4.25 -0.17 0.705 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.04 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2007 1480 104.3 -1.37 -2.60 0.910 47.9% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.21 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2008 1525 110.7 -1.22 -3.13 0.707 43.8% — — — 0.0% -2.86 — — — +0.01 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2009 1569 103.7 -4.27 +0.14 0.834 46.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.20 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2010 1529 110.6 +0.88 +0.35 1.275 52.7% +16 — — 42.9% +0.43 0–1 0–1 — +0.01 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2011 1537 106.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1733 122.4 -1.72 -0.89 0.891 47.8% -12 +58 +62 37.6% -0.72 15–19 (44%) 14–30 (32%) 93.8 +0.78 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.