H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Harel Levy vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 0-1
Lukas Lacko holds a 1–0 lead over Harel Levy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukas Lacko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lukas Lacko won the 2009 Halle third round 7-6(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2009* | Halle | ATP 500 | R32 | Grass | Lukas Lacko | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Harel Levy | Match data |
| Jun 9, 2009* | Halle | ATP 500 | Q3 | Grass | Harel Levy | 6-7(4) 6-4 6-2 | Lukas Lacko | Match data |
| May 28, 2007 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q1 | Clay | Harel Levy | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Lukas Lacko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harel Levy | #1,024 | #30 | 1,023 | 1,732 | 43 | 83 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lukas Lacko | #1,505 | #44 | 917 | 1,837 | 81 | 133 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Harel Levy | Lukas Lacko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #82 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #78 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #89 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #112 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #111 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #51 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #247 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #81 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #94 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–12 | 14.3% | #110 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #122 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #92 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #114 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #342 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #183 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |