H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Harold Solomon vs Balazs Taroczy H2H: 1-2
Balazs Taroczy holds a 2–1 lead over Harold Solomon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Balazs Taroczy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1982 Hartford Wct fourth round 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 1982* | Hartford Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Balazs Taroczy | 7-6 7-5 | Harold Solomon | Match data |
| Aug 8, 1977 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Balazs Taroczy | 6-4 6-2 | Harold Solomon | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1977* | Brussels | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Harold Solomon | 6-1 6-3 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harold Solomon | #1,115 | #5 | 2 | 2,161 | 578 | 334 | 63.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Harold Solomon | Balazs Taroczy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1974 | 61–39 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1975 | 71–32 | 68.9% | #17 | 1,983 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1976 | 72–29 | 71.3% | #8 | 2,041 | 0 | 10 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1977 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #14 | 2,001 | 0 | 13 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1978 | 70–33 | 68.0% | #9 | 1,903 | 0 | 15 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1979 | 65–23 | 73.9% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 18 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1980 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 22 | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1981 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 22 | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,797 | 0 | 22 | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | 1983 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 22 | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | 1984 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #223 | 1,632 | 0 | 22 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 22 | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 |
| 33 | 1986 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,593 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1106 | 1,573 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |