H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Harold Solomon vs Brian Teacher H2H: 2-2
Harold Solomon and Brian Teacher are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Brian Teacher leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Harold Solomon won the 1986 Cincinnati second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 1986* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Harold Solomon | 6-4 6-4 | Brian Teacher | Match data |
| May 9, 1984* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Brian Teacher | 6-2 2-6 6-3 | Harold Solomon | Match data |
| Mar 2, 1981 | Salisbury Wct | ATP 250 | RR | Carpet | Brian Teacher | 6-3 7-6 | Harold Solomon | Match data |
| Sep 22, 1978* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Harold Solomon | 6-1 6-2 | Brian Teacher | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harold Solomon | #1,115 | #5 | 2 | 2,161 | 578 | 334 | 63.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
| Brian Teacher | #938 | #7 | 0 | 2,043 | 338 | 237 | 58.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Harold Solomon | Brian Teacher | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #121 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #109 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 61–39 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #81 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1975 | 71–32 | 68.9% | #17 | 1,983 | 0 | 5 | 1977 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1976 | 72–29 | 71.3% | #8 | 2,041 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #31 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1977 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #14 | 2,001 | 0 | 13 | 1979 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #59 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1978 | 70–33 | 68.0% | #9 | 1,903 | 0 | 15 | 1980 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #20 | 2,039 | 1 | 4 |
| 26 | 1979 | 65–23 | 73.9% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 18 | 1981 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #9 | 1,987 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | 1980 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 22 | 1982 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #19 | 1,935 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1981 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 22 | 1983 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,822 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,797 | 0 | 22 | 1984 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #53 | 1,765 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | 1983 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 22 | 1985 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #66 | 1,708 | 1 | 8 |
| 31 | 1984 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #223 | 1,632 | 0 | 22 | 1986 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #104 | 1,618 | 1 | 8 |
| 32 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1986 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,593 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1106 | 1,573 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |