H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Harold Solomon vs Cliff Richey H2H: 4-4

Harold Solomon and Cliff Richey are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Harold Solomon leads 2–1 on clay, while Cliff Richey leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cliff Richey won the 1976 Palm Springs third round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Harold Solomon
USA Age 73 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 – 4
8 main draw meetings
Cliff Richey
USA Age 79 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 25, 1976* Palm Springs ATP 250 R32 Hard Cliff Richey #30 6-4 6-3 Harold Solomon #16 Match data
Mar 19, 1976* Washington Wct ATP 250 R16 Carpet Harold Solomon #16 6-3 3-6 6-2 Cliff Richey #30 Match data
Jul 26, 1975* Washington ATP 250 SF Clay Harold Solomon #15 7-5 6-1 Cliff Richey #22 Match data
Mar 22, 1975* Memphis ATP 250 QF Carpet Harold Solomon #15 6-2 7-6(6) Cliff Richey #20 Match data
Apr 17, 1973* Johannesburg Wct ATP 250 R32 Hard Cliff Richey 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(4) Harold Solomon Match data
Aug 5, 1971* Cincinnati Masters 1000 R32 Clay Harold Solomon 6-7 6-4 6-2 Cliff Richey Match data
Jul 29, 1971* Tanglewood ATP 250 QF Hard Cliff Richey 5-7 7-5 6-4 Harold Solomon Match data
Apr 25, 1971* Houston ATP 250 QF Clay Cliff Richey 6-1 7-6 Harold Solomon Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Harold Solomon #1,115 #5 2 2,161 578 334 63.4% 0 2 0 0 20 22
Cliff Richey #662 #16 0 2,112 488 224 68.5% 0 2 0 0 21 23

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Harold Solomon Cliff Richey
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1971 8–6 57.1% — 1,591 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1972 12–11 52.2% — 1,680 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1973 21–23 47.7% #59 1,767 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1974 61–39 61.0% #16 1,899 0 1 1968 46–15 75.4% — 1,750 0 3
22 1975 71–32 68.9% #17 1,983 0 5 1969 64–18 78.0% — 1,946 0 9
23 1976 72–29 71.3% #8 2,041 0 10 1970 88–24 78.6% — 2,047 0 14
24 1977 64–26 71.1% #14 2,001 0 13 1971 67–23 74.4% — 1,906 0 17
25 1978 70–33 68.0% #9 1,903 0 15 1972 54–24 69.2% — 1,956 0 20
26 1979 65–23 73.9% #8 1,999 0 18 1973 47–26 64.4% #19 1,848 0 20
27 1980 64–23 73.6% #7 1,991 0 22 1974 25–16 61.0% #23 1,891 0 21
28 1981 31–26 54.4% #21 1,757 0 22 1975 37–24 60.7% #32 1,855 0 21
29 1982 22–23 48.9% #66 1,797 0 22 1976 33–24 57.9% #28 1,848 0 22
30 1983 5–17 22.7% #95 1,622 0 22 1977 14–17 45.2% #97 1,714 0 22
31 1984 4–6 40.0% #223 1,632 0 22 1978 13–12 52.0% #57 1,705 0 23
32 1985 4–6 40.0% #106 1,614 0 22 1979 0–1 0.0% #662 1,693 0 23
33 1986 4–8 33.3% #240 1,593 0 22 — — — — — — —
38 1991 0–1 0.0% #1106 1,573 0 22 — — — — — — —