H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Harold Solomon vs Jim Osborne H2H: 4-0
Harold Solomon holds a 4–0 lead over Jim Osborne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Harold Solomon leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Harold Solomon won the 1976 San Francisco third round 6-4 1-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 81
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1976* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Harold Solomon | 6-4 1-6 7-5 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1975* | Maui | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Harold Solomon | 6-2 6-4 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Mar 5, 1973 | San Juan | ATP 250 | RR | Hard | Harold Solomon | 7-5 6-7 6-4 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1971* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Harold Solomon | 6-4 6-2 | Jim Osborne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harold Solomon | #1,115 | #5 | 2 | 2,161 | 578 | 334 | 63.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
| Jim Osborne | #831 | #211 | 0 | 1,817 | 118 | 121 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Harold Solomon | Jim Osborne | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1971 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1973 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1974 | 61–39 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1975 | 71–32 | 68.9% | #17 | 1,983 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1976 | 72–29 | 71.3% | #8 | 2,041 | 0 | 10 | 1968 | 35–24 | 59.3% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1977 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #14 | 2,001 | 0 | 13 | 1969 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1978 | 70–33 | 68.0% | #9 | 1,903 | 0 | 15 | 1970 | 26–29 | 47.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1979 | 65–23 | 73.9% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 18 | 1971 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1980 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 22 | 1972 | 8–20 | 28.6% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1981 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 22 | 1973 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,797 | 0 | 22 | 1974 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1983 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 22 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1984 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #223 | 1,632 | 0 | 22 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1986 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,593 | 0 | 22 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1106 | 1,573 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |