H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Harold Solomon vs Jorge Andrew H2H: 2-0
Harold Solomon holds a 2–0 lead over Jorge Andrew in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Harold Solomon leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Harold Solomon won the 1977 Cincinnati third round 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
VEN
Age 74
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1977* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Harold Solomon | 6-0 6-2 | Jorge Andrew | Match data |
| Mar 13, 1975* | Washington Indoor Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Harold Solomon | 6-4 6-1 | Jorge Andrew | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harold Solomon | #1,115 | #5 | 2 | 2,161 | 578 | 334 | 63.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
| Jorge Andrew | #831 | #66 | 0 | 1,621 | 36 | 105 | 25.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Harold Solomon | Jorge Andrew | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1971 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1972 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 61–39 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1975 | 71–32 | 68.9% | #17 | 1,983 | 0 | 5 | 1974 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #176 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1976 | 72–29 | 71.3% | #8 | 2,041 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 4–15 | 21.1% | #138 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1977 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #14 | 2,001 | 0 | 13 | 1976 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #125 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1978 | 70–33 | 68.0% | #9 | 1,903 | 0 | 15 | 1977 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1979 | 65–23 | 73.9% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 18 | 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1980 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 22 | 1979 | 3–24 | 11.1% | #311 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1981 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 22 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,408 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,797 | 0 | 22 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1983 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 22 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,387 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1984 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #223 | 1,632 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1986 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,593 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1106 | 1,573 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |