H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Harold Solomon vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 3-5

Roscoe Tanner holds a 5–3 lead over Harold Solomon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Roscoe Tanner leads 4–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Harold Solomon won the 1981 Las Vegas semifinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Harold Solomon
USA Age 73 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 5
8 main draw meetings
Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Harold Solomon #7 6-4 6-2 Roscoe Tanner #10 Match data Apr 25, 1981* SF Las Vegas ATP 250 Hard
Roscoe Tanner #10 6-2 7-6 Harold Solomon #7 Match data Feb 28, 1981* QF Memphis ATP 250 Carpet
Harold Solomon #7 6-4 6-3 Roscoe Tanner #11 Match data Aug 24, 1980* QF Cincinnati Open ATP 500 Hard
Harold Solomon #9 6-4 2-6 6-2 Roscoe Tanner #6 Match data Mar 1, 1980* QF Memphis ATP 250 Carpet
Roscoe Tanner #11 6-2 6-4 Harold Solomon #9 Match data Dec 12, 1978 RR Wct Challenge Cup ATP 250 Hard
Roscoe Tanner 7-6 6-3 Harold Solomon Match data Sep 20, 1975* SF Los Angeles Open ATP 250 Hard
Roscoe Tanner #14 6-3 6-2 Harold Solomon #15 Match data May 16, 1975* R16 Las Vegas ATP 250 Hard
Roscoe Tanner 7-6 6-3 Harold Solomon Match data Apr 5, 1974* QF Palm Desert Wct ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Harold Solomon #1,115 #5 2 2,163 566 328 63.3% 0 0 0 1 21 22
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,162 592 294 66.8% 1 0 0 0 16 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Harold Solomon Roscoe Tanner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
18 1971 8–6 57.1% — 1,591 0 0 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,416 0 0
19 1972 12–11 52.2% — 1,682 0 0 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,706 0 0
20 1973 21–23 47.7% #59 1,770 0 0 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,910 0 0
21 1974 59–38 60.8% #16 1,902 0 1 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,837 0 0
22 1975 69–31 69.0% #17 1,985 0 5 1974 65–27 70.7% #14 1,963 0 2
23 1976 72–29 71.3% #8 2,050 0 10 1975 65–23 73.9% #9 1,972 0 5
24 1977 65–27 70.7% #16 2,002 0 13 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,018 0 9
25 1978 67–32 67.7% #9 1,907 0 15 1977 52–30 63.4% #13 1,889 1 11
26 1979 64–22 74.4% #8 2,004 0 18 1978 57–22 72.2% #11 1,940 1 13
27 1980 61–22 73.5% #7 1,994 0 22 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,032 1 15
28 1981 29–24 54.7% #21 1,758 0 22 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,996 1 16
29 1982 22–23 48.9% #66 1,797 0 22 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,925 1 17
30 1983 5–17 22.7% #95 1,623 0 22 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,785 1 17
31 1984 4–6 40.0% #223 1,633 0 22 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,874 1 17
32 1985 4–6 40.0% #106 1,615 0 22 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,680 1 17
33 1986 4–8 33.3% #240 1,594 0 22 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,662 1 17
38 1991 0–1 0.0% #1106 1,574 0 22 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Harold Solomon Roscoe Tanner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 1971 3 2 5 60.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 1970 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1972 5 2 7 71.4% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1971 10 5 15 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1973 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 1972 9 3 12 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1974 18 11 29 62.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 1973 12 8 20 60.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 15 9 24 62.5%
22 1975 19 10 29 65.5% 32 12 44 72.7% — — — — 18 9 27 66.7% 1974 30 11 41 73.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 17 3 20 85.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
23 1976 18 5 23 78.3% 35 11 46 76.1% — — — — 19 13 32 59.4% 1975 27 7 34 79.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 13 6 19 68.4%
24 1977 12 8 20 60.0% 40 9 49 81.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1976 22 10 32 68.8% 22 6 28 78.6% 10 3 13 76.9% 16 9 25 64.0%
25 1978 18 9 27 66.7% 31 9 40 77.5% — — — — 18 14 32 56.3% 1977 8 6 14 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 22 6 28 78.6% 6 9 15 40.0%
26 1979 22 8 30 73.3% 29 9 38 76.3% — — — — 13 5 18 72.2% 1978 19 8 27 70.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 9 34 73.5%
27 1980 22 5 27 81.5% 22 7 29 75.9% — — — — 17 10 27 63.0% 1979 21 5 26 80.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 10 35 71.4%
28 1981 12 9 21 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1% — — — — 6 8 14 42.9% 1980 14 6 20 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 16 7 23 69.6%
29 1982 14 9 23 60.9% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% 1981 19 8 27 70.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 21 8 29 72.4%
30 1983 1 5 6 16.7% 4 10 14 28.6% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
31 1984 — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
32 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 1 8 9 11.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
33 1986 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
38 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 176 97 273 64.5% 267 120 387 69.0% 2 14 16 12.5% 121 97 218 55.5% — 209 102 311 67.2% 99 59 158 62.7% 121 42 163 74.2% 163 91 254 64.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Harold Solomon Roscoe Tanner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1969 1481 98.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1478 101.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.19 1969 1479 102.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.14 0–1 — — -0.17
18 1971 1591 125.4 — — — — +24 +9 — 52.9% +0.15 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.27 1970 1417 113.2 — — — — +103 +73 — 13.6% -1.45 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.50
19 1972 1682 124.4 — — — — -22 +15 -167 45.8% -0.22 4–2 (67%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.59 1971 1706 127.5 — — — — -2 -129 -172 56.9% +0.31 6–2 (75%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.17
20 1973 1770 142.2 — — — — -41 -43 -248 46.4% -0.25 9–8 (53%) 8–8 (50%) — -6.22 1972 1910 135.7 — — — — -21 -296 -167 59.5% +0.43 11–3 (79%) 14–8 (64%) — -0.27
21 1974 1902 149.2 — — — — +1 +50 -446 55.8% +0.36 20–11 (65%) 10–5 (67%) — -6.27 1973 1838 144.5 — — — — +53 -90 -106 56.7% +0.51 11–10 (52%) 15–15 (50%) — -3.40
22 1975 1986 151.9 — — — — +2 -3 — 62.2% +0.94 22–8 (73%) 13–9 (59%) — +0.92 1974 1963 154.0 — — — — -10 -226 +137 65.9% +1.12 16–13 (55%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.27
23 1976 2050 164.1 — — — — -8 +45 — 64.0% +1.02 25–11 (69%) 12–9 (57%) — -5.85 1975 1972 153.3 — — — — +62 -153 +164 67.7% +1.19 19–14 (58%) 17–14 (55%) — -0.74
24 1977 2002 158.5 — — — — -33 +102 — 64.3% +1.02 19–6 (76%) 8–10 (44%) — -3.06 1976 2018 159.4 — — — — +24 -49 +104 66.7% +1.29 18–11 (62%) 18–20 (47%) — -2.11
25 1978 1908 162.8 — — — — +1 +192 — 62.4% +0.83 20–10 (67%) 15–9 (63%) — -4.63 1977 1890 153.2 — — — — -1 +22 +206 62.7% +0.94 13–18 (42%) 11–12 (48%) — -0.49
26 1979 2005 161.5 — — — — +7 +88 — 67.7% +1.21 19–10 (66%) 12–4 (75%) — +0.72 1978 1941 160.3 — — — — +36 -25 +162 67.2% +1.20 10–8 (56%) 23–10 (70%) — -1.59
27 1980 1994 163.5 — — — — +46 +74 — 67.0% +0.99 17–6 (74%) 13–8 (62%) — -4.31 1979 2032 164.1 — — — — +32 -91 +131 71.3% +1.27 13–8 (62%) 22–14 (61%) — -3.91
28 1981 1759 154.2 — — — — +58 +203 — 51.7% +0.54 4–5 (44%) 2–8 (20%) — -1.86 1980 1997 154.8 — — — — +23 — +198 70.9% +1.29 6–10 (38%) 17–5 (77%) — -1.79
29 1982 1798 154.7 — — — — +11 +102 — 51.3% +0.21 7–11 (39%) 5–6 (45%) — -5.44 1981 1926 156.1 — — — — +117 — +82 66.0% +1.02 14–9 (61%) 19–13 (59%) — -0.51
30 1983 1624 125.9 — — — — +50 +134 — 31.5% -1.04 2–6 (25%) 1–3 (25%) — -1.77 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +4 — +208 51.5% -0.01 9–6 (60%) 10–12 (45%) — -2.07
31 1984 1633 121.4 — — — — — +87 — 50.0% +0.08 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — -0.31 1983 1874 146.4 — — — — -44 — +125 53.4% +0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–7 (61%) — -4.29
32 1985 1616 120.3 — — — — +10 +96 — 43.5% -0.26 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.03 1984 1681 120.1 — — — — -28 — — 25.8% -1.52 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.69
33 1986 1594 116.2 — — — — +38 +78 — 43.3% -1.00 0–5 (0%) — — -0.58 1985 1662 99.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.08
38 1991 1575 95.8 -0.57 -1.98 0.778 42.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2164 159.4 -0.57 -1.98 0.778 42.9% +6 +78 -304 59.0% +0.65 174–106 (62%) 105–86 (55%) 102.5 -4.42 — 2162 157.4 — — — — +30 -96 +112 63.1% +0.88 155–123 (56%) 200–155 (56%) 99.8 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.