H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Harold Solomon vs Van Winitsky H2H: 2-1
Harold Solomon holds a 2–1 lead over Van Winitsky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Harold Solomon leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Van Winitsky won the 1980 Boston third round 7-6 5-7 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 73
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1980* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Van Winitsky | 7-6 5-7 7-6 | Harold Solomon | Match data |
| Jun 1, 1980* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Harold Solomon | 6-7 6-4 7-5 6-4 | Van Winitsky | Match data |
| Nov 29, 1978* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Harold Solomon | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Van Winitsky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harold Solomon | #1,115 | #5 | 2 | 2,161 | 578 | 334 | 63.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 22 |
| Van Winitsky | #834 | #35 | 0 | 1,852 | 106 | 133 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Harold Solomon | Van Winitsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #282 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1971 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #169 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 12–11 | 52.2% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1973 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1974 | 61–39 | 61.0% | #16 | 1,899 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1975 | 71–32 | 68.9% | #17 | 1,983 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #47 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1976 | 72–29 | 71.3% | #8 | 2,041 | 0 | 10 | 1982 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #53 | 1,698 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1977 | 64–26 | 71.1% | #14 | 2,001 | 0 | 13 | 1983 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #91 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1978 | 70–33 | 68.0% | #9 | 1,903 | 0 | 15 | 1984 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,564 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1979 | 65–23 | 73.9% | #8 | 1,999 | 0 | 18 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,551 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1980 | 64–23 | 73.6% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1981 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #21 | 1,757 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1982 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,797 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1983 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #95 | 1,622 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1984 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #223 | 1,632 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1985 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #106 | 1,614 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1986 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,593 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1106 | 1,573 | 0 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |