H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Hendrik Dreekmann vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 0-3
Daniel Vacek holds a 3–0 lead over Hendrik Dreekmann in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniel Vacek leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniel Vacek won the 1999 S Hertogenbosch third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 1999* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Daniel Vacek | 6-2 6-2 | Hendrik Dreekmann | Match data |
| May 8, 1996* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Daniel Vacek | 6-3 6-2 | Hendrik Dreekmann | Match data |
| Nov 11, 1994* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Daniel Vacek | 5-7 6-2 6-1 | Hendrik Dreekmann | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hendrik Dreekmann | #1,171 | #39 | 1,013 | 1,786 | 95 | 116 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Vacek | #1,133 | #26 | 1,151 | 1,818 | 170 | 219 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hendrik Dreekmann | Daniel Vacek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1994 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #64 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1995 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #93 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #470 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1996 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #49 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1997 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #91 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #114 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1998 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #45 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1999 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #129 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #27 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #53 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #880 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #50 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #888 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 29–31 | 48.3% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #238 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #393 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #749 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |