H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Henri Laaksonen vs Antonio Veic H2H: 1-0
Henri Laaksonen holds a 1–0 lead over Antonio Veic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Henri Laaksonen leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Henri Laaksonen won the 2013 Bastad third round 5-7 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2013* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Henri Laaksonen | 5-7 6-1 6-1 | Antonio Veic | Match data |
| Jul 31, 2011 | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | Q1 | Clay | Antonio Veic | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Antonio Veic | #888 | #119 | 468 | 1,719 | 10 | 22 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Henri Laaksonen | Antonio Veic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #271 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #220 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #191 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #159 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #131 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #473 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |