H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Herb Fitzgibbon vs Pancho Guzman H2H: 0-1

Pancho Guzman holds a 1–0 lead over Herb Fitzgibbon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pancho Guzman leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pancho Guzman won the 1969 Macon round of 32 8-6 12-14 6-4.

USA Age 84 Right-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pancho Guzman 8-6 12-14 6-4 Herb Fitzgibbon Match data Feb 20, 1969* R32 Macon ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Herb Fitzgibbon #291 #128 0 1,683 46 38 54.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pancho Guzman 1,579 0 0 0 0 1 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Herb Fitzgibbon Pancho Guzman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
25 1968 29–17 63.0% 1,652 0 1
26 1969 4–6 40.0% 1,590 0 1
27 1970 1–4 20.0% 1,542 0 1
28 1971 6–3 66.7% 1,605 0 1
29 1972 1–3 25.0% 1,608 0 1
30 1973 5–5 50.0% #167 1,620 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Herb Fitzgibbon Pancho Guzman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
22 1968 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1969 0 2 2 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 1970 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1968 2 3 5 40.0% 20 8 28 71.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1969 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1970 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1971 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
29 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
Career 9 10 19 47.4% 22 9 31 71.0% 12 12 24 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 10 11 9.1% 14 15 29 48.3% 3 10 13 23.1% 3 4 7 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Herb Fitzgibbon Pancho Guzman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
22 1968 1444 94.7 -32 +102 30.6% -1.44 3–3 (50%) -0.05
23 1969 1517 109.5 -49 +114 -97 44.3% -0.19 6–4 (60%) +1.32
24 1970 1464 94.9 0.0% -4.34 -0.10
25 1968 1653 120.6 -137 +75 -101 60.7% +0.90 3–5 (38%) +0.26 1971 1496 108.4 50.0% +0.10 1–1 0–1 +0.01
26 1969 1591 106.0 -94 +151 48.1% 0.00 1–3 (25%) +1.59
27 1970 1543 101.7 -46 28.6% -0.71 0–1 0–1 +0.31
28 1971 1605 105.5 -49 -58 56.0% +0.08 3–0 (100%) 5–3 (63%) 105.3 +1.07
29 1972 1608 109.0 -59 33.3% -1.00 0–1 2–0 -0.57
30 1973 1621 115.6 -45 42.9% -0.79 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 103.5 -0.33
Career 1684 117.7 -88 +82 -72 53.3% +0.31 10–11 (48%) 8–6 (57%) 101.1 +2.81 1580 103.9 -41 +110 -97 36.7% -0.91 10–8 (56%) 0–1 +2.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.