H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Hicham Arazi vs Adrian Voinea H2H: 2-0
Hicham Arazi holds a 2–0 lead over Adrian Voinea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hicham Arazi leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 1999 Kitzbuhel third round 6-7(2) 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 1999* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Hicham Arazi | 6-7(2) 7-6(5) 7-5 | Adrian Voinea | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1999* | Merano | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Hicham Arazi | 6-7(5) 6-1 6-4 | Adrian Voinea | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Adrian Voinea | #1,046 | #36 | 957 | 1,756 | 126 | 168 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hicham Arazi | Adrian Voinea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #56 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #45 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #71 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #110 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |