H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Holger Rune vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 1-0
Holger Rune holds a 1–0 lead over Henri Laaksonen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Holger Rune leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Holger Rune won the 2022 Roland Garros second round 6-2 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Denmark
Age 23
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Holger Rune | 6-2 6-3 6-3 | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holger Rune | #81 | #4 | 4,825 | 2,119 | 170 | 100 | 63.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Holger Rune | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2021 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #103 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #11 | 2,078 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #8 | 1,967 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,988 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #15 | 1,904 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |