H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Horacio de la Pena vs David Carter H2H: 1-0

Horacio de la Pena holds a 1–0 lead over David Carter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Horacio de la Pena leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio de la Pena won the 1984 Forest Hills Wct round of 64 6-2 6-0.

ARG Age 60 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings
AUS Age 70 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Horacio de la Pena 6-2 6-0 David Carter Match data May 8, 1984* R64 Forest Hills Wct ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Horacio de la Pena #846 #31 679 1,833 185 173 51.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4
David Carter #606 #78 0 1,732 76 119 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Horacio de la Pena David Carter
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1970 1–1 50.0% 1,484 0 0
16 1972 0–1 0.0% 1,477 0 0
17 1984 4–4 50.0% #89 1,548 0 0 1973 0–1 0.0% 1,460 0 0
18 1985 23–17 57.5% #70 1,689 0 1 1974 1–1 50.0% 1,470 0 0
19 1986 33–21 61.1% #38 1,734 0 1 1975 3–2 60.0% #373 1,511 0 0
20 1987 17–19 47.2% #88 1,643 0 1 1976 1–1 50.0% #288 1,530 0 0
21 1988 27–17 61.4% #52 1,737 0 1 1977 2–3 40.0% #269 1,530 0 0
22 1989 15–17 46.9% #128 1,651 0 2 1978 12–19 38.7% #139 1,549 0 0
23 1990 20–14 58.8% #63 1,724 0 3 1979 8–16 33.3% #118 1,597 0 0
24 1991 16–18 47.1% #101 1,721 0 3 1980 15–23 39.5% #145 1,603 0 0
25 1992 7–18 28.0% #114 1,551 0 3 1981 16–19 45.7% #95 1,699 0 0
26 1993 17–16 51.5% #79 1,594 0 4 1982 14–23 37.8% #85 1,602 0 0
27 1994 6–12 33.3% #265 1,555 0 4 1983 3–8 27.3% #190 1,581 0 0
28 1984 0–1 0.0% #609 1,561 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Horacio de la Pena David Carter
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1970 1 1 2 50.0%
16 1972 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 1973 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1985 5 3 8 62.5% 18 14 32 56.3% 1974 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 29 16 45 64.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 3 2 5 60.0%
20 1987 0 5 5 0.0% 17 14 31 54.8% 1976 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1988 10 7 17 58.8% 17 8 25 68.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1989 4 7 11 36.4% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 6 9 15 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1990 1 4 5 20.0% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 1 2 3 33.3% 5 10 15 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 1991 0 3 3 0.0% 16 14 30 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 6 10 16 37.5% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 7 16 23 30.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 12 10 22 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
26 1993 17 15 32 53.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 2 9 11 18.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1994 6 12 18 33.3% 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 24 34 58 41.4% 159 129 288 55.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 16 32 48 33.3% 38 52 90 42.2% 18 27 45 40.0% 4 8 12 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Horacio de la Pena David Carter
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1970 1484 94.7 0.0% -4.50 +0.23
16 1972 1478 96.2 0.0% -3.50 -0.02
17 1984 1548 126.7 +36 47.6% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) +0.10 1973 1460 92.3 0.0% -5.00 +0.14
18 1985 1690 129.7 -65 -50 53.6% -0.07 6–5 (55%) 8–3 (73%) +1.63 1974 1471 103.6 50.0% -0.34 1–1 +0.11
19 1986 1734 143.7 -95 +41 58.3% +0.71 9–7 (56%) 7–6 (54%) -0.16 1975 1512 109.5 +38 50.0% +0.22 2–0 0–1 +0.47
20 1987 1643 127.6 -87 +98 47.2% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) -0.41 1976 1531 105.7 42.9% -0.29 +0.16
21 1988 1737 136.6 -122 +90 56.6% +0.42 10–5 (67%) 11–6 (65%) +1.19 1977 1530 108.0 +17 46.2% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 1–0 +0.40
22 1989 1651 127.5 -43 +105 48.2% +0.13 3–4 (43%) 3–7 (30%) +0.13 1978 1550 134.3 -3 +30 +30 43.4% -0.38 3–6 (33%) 1–6 (14%) +0.41
23 1990 1725 133.8 -197 +118 59.5% +0.73 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) +0.57 1979 1597 121.4 -30 -32 -21 36.9% -1.23 3–3 (50%) 2–3 (40%) -0.67
24 1991 1722 138.0 -245 +79 50.7% +0.16 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) -0.62 1980 1604 128.6 -46 +10 41.8% -0.65 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) +0.84
25 1992 1552 118.2 +61 36.5% -1.29 1–8 (11%) 3–1 (75%) -0.09 1981 1699 132.3 -92 +7 -163 43.8% -0.45 10–6 (63%) 6–2 (75%) +0.01
26 1993 1595 127.5 +37 52.7% +0.27 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) +1.20 1982 1602 125.8 -53 +61 -25 40.4% -0.52 5–4 (56%) 7–7 (50%) +0.86
27 1994 1556 113.8 +6 41.0% -0.49 2–4 (33%) 0–3 (0%) +0.33 1983 1581 115.4 -37 +46 32.0% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) -0.32
28 1984 1562 93.3 0.0% -5.00 +0.18
Career 1833 138.3 -105 +55 51.7% +0.12 53–56 (49%) 52–47 (53%) 98.5 +1.08 1732 130.8 -45 +16 -22 40.8% -0.67 32–31 (51%) 25–26 (49%) 104.4 +1.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.