H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Horacio de la Pena vs Francisco Roig H2H: 1-1
Horacio de la Pena and Francisco Roig are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Francisco Roig leads 1–0 on clay, while Horacio de la Pena leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Francisco Roig won the 1994 Barcelona third round 6-4 5-7 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 1994* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Francisco Roig | 6-4 5-7 7-6(4) | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
| Nov 24, 1988* | Itaparica | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Horacio de la Pena | 3-6 7-6 6-4 | Francisco Roig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Francisco Roig | #889 | #60 | 579 | 1,715 | 64 | 96 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio de la Pena | Francisco Roig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #251 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #107 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #122 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #129 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #172 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #156 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #116 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #153 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #333 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #798 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |