H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Horacio Zeballos vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-1
Horacio Zeballos and Michal Przysiezny are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Michal Przysiezny won the 2014 Australian Open first round 6-3 7-6(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Michal Przysiezny | 6-3 7-6(4) 7-5 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
| Aug 3, 2010* | Washington | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Horacio Zeballos | 3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Horacio Zeballos | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |