H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Horacio Zeballos vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 1-0

Horacio Zeballos holds a 1–0 lead over Thiemo de Bakker in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Horacio Zeballos leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Horacio Zeballos won the 2013 Miami Open first round 6-1 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Horacio Zeballos
ARG Age 41 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Thiemo de Bakker
NED Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Horacio Zeballos #39 6-1 3-6 6-3 Thiemo de Bakker #102 Match data Mar 22, 2013* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Horacio Zeballos #841 #39 1,027 1,877 87 131 39.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Thiemo de Bakker #1,382 #40 1,010 1,853 54 80 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Horacio Zeballos Thiemo de Bakker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 1–1 50.0% #464 1,512 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 1–4 20.0% #444 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 1–1 50.0% #249 1,531 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2009 2–3 40.0% #96 1,612 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2010 26–23 53.1% #43 1,763 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2011 2–11 15.4% #223 1,665 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,642 0 0
24 2009 5–5 50.0% #45 1,613 0 0 2013 7–10 41.2% #146 1,683 0 0
25 2010 14–26 35.0% #110 1,595 0 0 2014 7–6 53.8% #144 1,665 0 0
26 2011 5–6 45.5% #109 1,598 0 0 2015 2–5 28.6% #99 1,617 0 0
27 2012 3–9 25.0% #85 1,591 0 0 2016 5–12 29.4% #257 1,582 0 0
28 2013 14–23 37.8% #56 1,587 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2014 7–9 43.8% #123 1,633 0 1 2018 0–1 0.0% #242 1,558 0 0
30 2015 2–4 33.3% #124 1,645 0 1 2019 0–1 0.0% #511 1,536 0 0
31 2016 7–13 35.0% #71 1,670 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2017 20–22 47.6% #66 1,759 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2018 10–14 41.7% #173 1,721 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Horacio Zeballos Thiemo de Bakker
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 6 7 14.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2009 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2010 5 13 18 27.8% 8 11 19 42.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 2016 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
28 2013 3 9 12 25.0% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2015 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2016 6 5 11 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 15 12 27 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 3 5 8 37.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 51 81 37.0% 55 69 124 44.4% 2 11 13 15.4% — 27 45 72 37.5% 20 24 44 45.5% 7 11 18 38.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 218/218 of Horacio Zeballos's and 133/134 of Thiemo de Bakker's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Horacio Zeballos Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 3.5 3.0 54.6% 74.1% 49.1% 72.9% 41.7% 62.8% 39.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/5 8.2 1.2 65.7% 71.8% 58.9% 57.1% 49.6% 67.3% 25.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 7.5 1.0 55.0% 73.1% 56.3% 68.6% 31.3% 66.0% 34.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 5/5 5.8 1.4 62.2% 70.1% 51.0% 61.2% 36.1% 62.1% 36.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 49/49 9.8 1.6 61.0% 73.7% 53.5% 60.8% 41.7% 65.8% 35.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 13/13 6.5 2.8 54.5% 68.0% 48.7% 53.9% 21.4% 59.2% 28.0%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 2/2 5.0 1.0 55.3% 60.2% 42.0% 48.5% 100.0% 52.1% 28.9%
24 2009 10/10 6.8 2.7 65.2% 71.0% 57.0% 65.7% 54.8% 66.1% 32.9% 2013 17/17 6.2 2.0 60.6% 69.6% 45.6% 62.0% 41.5% 60.2% 34.7%
25 2010 40/40 5.8 2.2 63.1% 67.6% 47.7% 60.4% 40.6% 60.5% 32.0% 2014 12/13 8.7 2.2 57.1% 77.0% 47.1% 64.2% 26.3% 64.1% 33.6%
26 2011 11/11 6.0 2.7 61.9% 73.7% 49.3% 65.4% 44.9% 64.3% 34.0% 2015 7/7 9.0 2.0 54.3% 74.6% 49.2% 59.1% 37.8% 63.0% 34.9%
27 2012 12/12 5.5 2.8 62.0% 67.1% 51.1% 62.2% 33.6% 61.2% 33.9% 2016 17/17 7.2 1.5 60.3% 70.5% 47.1% 49.0% 36.1% 61.3% 33.8%
28 2013 37/37 5.6 2.7 62.6% 69.2% 49.1% 59.1% 36.2% 61.6% 30.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 16/16 4.0 1.8 59.1% 72.9% 52.7% 59.2% 36.6% 64.5% 30.5% 2018 1/1 4.0 3.0 71.7% 60.6% 15.4% 33.3% — 47.8% 15.8%
30 2015 6/6 7.2 2.8 62.6% 67.8% 44.1% 67.3% 35.5% 59.1% 31.0% 2019 1/1 9.0 4.0 58.2% 68.8% 17.4% 69.2% — 47.3% 21.4%
31 2016 20/20 6.2 3.1 60.1% 72.6% 51.9% 55.7% 34.3% 64.1% 28.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 42/42 5.8 2.2 64.1% 71.2% 54.7% 56.0% 37.5% 65.0% 32.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 24/24 6.4 3.0 63.5% 71.6% 50.7% 69.3% 38.9% 64.1% 31.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 218/218 5.8 2.5 62.6% 70.3% 51.0% 60.6% 38.6% 63.0% 31.6% — 133/134 8.1 1.8 59.5% 72.0% 49.7% 58.8% 37.6% 63.0% 33.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Horacio Zeballos Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1513 104.7 -0.21 +0.15 1.055 51.5% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — -0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 115.2 -0.81 -3.06 0.782 47.1% — — — 35.7% -0.79 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.08
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1532 107.0 -0.17 -0.92 1.000 50.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1612 119.7 +1.05 -2.08 0.949 49.0% — — — 41.7% -0.58 1–1 2–2 (50%) — 0.00
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1764 149.9 +1.79 +0.33 1.050 50.7% -70 +14 -122 50.8% +0.25 7–5 (58%) 11–16 (41%) 101.3 +0.27
22 2007 1461 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1665 125.5 -1.60 -4.74 0.686 44.4% -43 +82 — 27.0% -1.97 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 100.3 -0.54
23 2008 1506 105.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1642 103.3 -3.01 -3.23 0.604 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.03
24 2009 1613 122.4 +1.10 -2.29 0.970 50.1% +38 — — 53.8% +0.27 0–2 6–5 (55%) — +0.76 2013 1684 129.6 -1.39 -1.41 0.871 47.6% -45 +78 -77 37.8% -0.81 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.5 -0.74
25 2010 1595 130.9 -1.88 -3.97 0.808 46.6% -14 +43 -118 37.2% -1.03 6–7 (46%) 7–9 (44%) 99.7 +0.16 2014 1665 127.0 +0.17 -1.17 0.935 48.9% +12 — — 48.1% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.8 +0.61
26 2011 1598 122.3 +1.03 -2.09 0.954 49.5% — +59 — 48.0% -0.04 0–1 3–4 (43%) — -0.49 2015 1618 116.8 +1.14 -1.79 0.944 49.0% — +111 — 41.2% -0.17 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 +0.19
27 2012 1591 117.8 -2.87 -2.13 0.873 48.1% — +83 — 31.0% -0.66 0–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.33 2016 1583 124.7 -1.66 -1.23 0.874 47.5% +82 +70 — 34.9% -1.05 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 98.4 -0.71
28 2013 1587 139.5 -1.23 -4.62 0.798 46.8% -106 +128 — 39.6% -0.52 10–5 (67%) 6–13 (32%) 103.9 +1.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2014 1633 127.6 +0.28 -3.69 0.858 48.3% -130 +105 — 41.7% -0.45 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) 101.6 +0.69 2018 1558 101.5 -1.76 -3.04 0.303 33.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
30 2015 1645 109.3 -1.33 -2.33 0.758 45.3% — +91 — 35.7% -1.72 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.09 2019 1536 99.8 +0.16 -1.51 0.406 36.1% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.04
31 2016 1671 134.9 +0.65 -5.16 0.790 47.3% -42 -28 -181 38.3% -0.77 2–1 (67%) 3–4 (43%) 101.8 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 1759 146.3 +0.83 -2.99 0.928 48.8% -104 +58 — 45.6% -0.27 8–4 (67%) 13–13 (50%) 106.3 -1.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1721 138.6 +0.08 -3.27 0.880 48.8% -71 +37 — 43.9% -0.35 4–6 (40%) 8–8 (50%) 98.5 -1.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1705 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1877 137.5 -0.40 -3.58 0.854 47.8% -57 +70 -150 41.4% -0.54 32–29 (52%) 52–65 (44%) 103.5 +0.40 — 1854 134.5 +0.13 -1.17 0.910 48.5% -29 +62 -104 41.6% -0.54 18–21 (46%) 33–36 (48%) 101.5 -0.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.