H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Hubert Hurkacz vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 2-1
Hubert Hurkacz holds a 2–1 lead over Dominic Thiem in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hubert Hurkacz leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2022 Antwerp quarterfinal 3-6 7-6(9) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Poland
Age 29
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2022* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 3-6 7-6(9) 7-6(4) | Hubert Hurkacz | Match data |
| Sep 23, 2022* | Metz | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Hubert Hurkacz | 6-3 6-4 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2019* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Hubert Hurkacz | 6-4 6-4 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hubert Hurkacz | #68 | #6 | 4,235 | 2,053 | 215 | 147 | 59.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 |
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hubert Hurkacz | Dominic Thiem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #86 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2019 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2021 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #9 | 1,949 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #10 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 2023 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 |
| 27 | 2024 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #16 | 1,941 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2025 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #72 | 1,913 | 0 | 8 | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2026 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #68 | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 |