H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Hubert Hurkacz vs Dusan Lajovic H2H: 3-0
Hubert Hurkacz holds a 3–0 lead over Dusan Lajovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hubert Hurkacz leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hubert Hurkacz won the 2023 Basel third round 7-6(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Poland
Age 29
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 36
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2023* | Basel | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Hubert Hurkacz | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
| May 6, 2022* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Hubert Hurkacz | 7-5 6-3 | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
| Jul 3, 2019* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Hubert Hurkacz | 6-3 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
| Oct 7, 2018* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Hubert Hurkacz | 4-6 6-0 3-0 (ret.) | Dusan Lajovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hubert Hurkacz | #68 | #6 | 4,235 | 2,053 | 215 | 147 | 59.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 |
| Dusan Lajovic | #152 | #23 | 1,895 | 1,900 | 192 | 257 | 42.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hubert Hurkacz | Dusan Lajovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #86 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #190 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #163 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #116 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #9 | 1,949 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #10 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #76 | 1,794 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #93 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #16 | 1,941 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #75 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #72 | 1,913 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,822 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #68 | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #34 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #26 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #33 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #80 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #81 | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #121 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |