H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Hubert Hurkacz vs Tennys Sandgren H2H: 1-1
Hubert Hurkacz and Tennys Sandgren are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Tennys Sandgren won the 2020 Roland Garros first round 7-5 2-6 4-6 7-6(1) 11-9.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Poland
Age 29
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 34
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2020* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Tennys Sandgren | 7-5 2-6 4-6 7-6(1) 11-9 | Hubert Hurkacz | Match data |
| May 29, 2018* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Hubert Hurkacz | 6-2 6-2 3-6 6-3 | Tennys Sandgren | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hubert Hurkacz | #68 | #6 | 4,235 | 2,053 | 215 | 147 | 59.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 |
| Tennys Sandgren | #1,243 | #41 | 1,091 | 1,870 | 47 | 75 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hubert Hurkacz | Tennys Sandgren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #86 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2019 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #9 | 1,949 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #10 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #96 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | 2018 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #16 | 1,941 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #68 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2025 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #72 | 1,913 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #49 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2026 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #68 | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #96 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |