H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Hubert Hurkacz vs Zhizhen Zhang H2H: 2-2
Hubert Hurkacz and Zhizhen Zhang are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Zhizhen Zhang won the 2025 Grand Prix Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes fourth round 6-4 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Poland
Age 29
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
China
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2025* | Grand Prix Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Zhizhen Zhang | 6-4 6-7 6-3 | Hubert Hurkacz | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2023* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Zhizhen Zhang | 3-6 6-4 7-6(4) | Hubert Hurkacz | Match data |
| Oct 11, 2023* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Hubert Hurkacz | 7-6(6) 4-6 7-6(4) | Zhizhen Zhang | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2019* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Hubert Hurkacz | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Zhizhen Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hubert Hurkacz | #68 | #6 | 4,235 | 2,053 | 215 | 147 | 59.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 |
| Zhizhen Zhang | #156 | #31 | 1,351 | 1,842 | 57 | 74 | 43.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hubert Hurkacz | Zhizhen Zhang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #86 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #413 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #360 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #9 | 1,949 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #10 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #321 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | 2022 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #99 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #16 | 1,941 | 0 | 8 | 2023 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #72 | 1,913 | 0 | 8 | 2024 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #45 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #68 | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | 2025 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #410 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |