H2H data updated: 2026-07-16 14:15 UTC
Hyeon Chung vs Marius Copil H2H: 0-1
Marius Copil holds a 1–0 lead over Hyeon Chung in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marius Copil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marius Copil won the 2016 Sofia third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
South Korea
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 35
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2016* | Sofia | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Marius Copil | 6-2 6-3 | Hyeon Chung | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyeon Chung | #493 | #19 | 1,897 | 2,022 | 71 | 67 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marius Copil | #1,021 | #56 | 888 | 1,811 | 47 | 81 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hyeon Chung | Marius Copil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #104 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #217 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #160 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #25 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #147 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #128 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #172 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #165 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #60 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #153 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |