H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Hyung-Taik Lee vs Kevin Kim H2H: 1-2
Kevin Kim holds a 2–1 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kevin Kim leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2007 Los Angeles third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2007* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-3 6-2 | Kevin Kim | Match data |
| Jul 18, 2005 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kevin Kim | 7-6(8) 6-4 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2005* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kevin Kim | 3-6 6-4 6-3 3-6 6-1 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kevin Kim | #1,213 | #63 | 866 | 1,641 | 44 | 97 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hyung-Taik Lee | Kevin Kim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #238 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #101 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #101 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #178 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #117 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #245 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |