H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 1-1
Igor Andreev and Frank Dancevic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Frank Dancevic leads 1–0 on grass, while Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2009 Eastbourne third round 7-6(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 41
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2009* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Frank Dancevic | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2009* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Igor Andreev | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Frank Dancevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Frank Dancevic | #406 | #65 | 783 | 1,773 | 54 | 89 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Frank Dancevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #434 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #143 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #363 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |