H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Igor Andreev vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 1-1

Igor Andreev and Frank Dancevic are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Frank Dancevic leads 1–0 on grass, while Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Frank Dancevic won the 2009 Eastbourne Open first round 7-6(6) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Igor Andreev
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Frank Dancevic
CAN Age 41 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Frank Dancevic #126 7-6(6) 6-2 Igor Andreev #25 Match data Jun 17, 2009* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP 250 Grass
Igor Andreev #19 7-6(2) 6-3 Frank Dancevic #131 Match data Jan 15, 2009* R32 Sydney International ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Igor Andreev #1,016 #18 2,490 1,929 223 216 50.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Frank Dancevic #406 #65 783 1,771 54 90 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Igor Andreev Frank Dancevic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2002 1–2 33.3% — 1,505 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #201 1,497 0 0
19 2003 4–4 50.0% #88 1,565 0 0 2004 1–2 33.3% #171 1,486 0 0
20 2004 27–27 50.0% #50 1,664 0 0 2005 2–6 25.0% #188 1,472 0 0
21 2005 37–29 56.1% #26 1,833 0 3 2006 6–9 40.0% #88 1,557 0 0
22 2006 13–13 50.0% #91 1,761 0 3 2007 16–18 47.1% #72 1,696 0 0
23 2007 31–26 54.4% #33 1,769 0 3 2008 6–11 35.3% #130 1,652 0 0
24 2008 40–28 58.8% #19 1,895 0 3 2009 9–11 45.0% #143 1,698 0 0
25 2009 27–30 47.4% #35 1,694 0 3 2010 2–3 40.0% #269 1,663 0 0
26 2010 17–19 47.2% #79 1,700 0 3 2011 2–6 25.0% #151 1,696 0 0
27 2011 15–24 38.5% #115 1,688 0 3 2012 1–5 16.7% #165 1,604 0 0
28 2012 12–15 44.4% #110 1,684 0 3 2013 2–3 40.0% #122 1,687 0 0
29 2013 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,587 0 3 2014 2–6 25.0% #149 1,654 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2015 0–3 0.0% #209 1,601 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2016 3–3 50.0% #241 1,663 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #363 1,658 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Igor Andreev Frank Dancevic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2004 7 10 17 41.2% 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2005 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2005 10 13 23 43.5% 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 2006 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2006 12 8 20 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2007 9 9 18 50.0% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2008 22 15 37 59.5% 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
25 2009 14 19 33 42.4% 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2010 6 9 15 40.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2011 7 11 18 38.9% 6 11 17 35.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2013 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 90 99 189 47.6% 108 92 200 54.0% 16 17 33 48.5% 9 8 17 52.9% — 32 61 93 34.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 21 23 44 47.7% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 427/439 of Igor Andreev's and 143/144 of Frank Dancevic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Igor Andreev Frank Dancevic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 3/3 6.7 3.7 49.8% 68.8% 44.1% 52.2% 45.1% 56.5% 29.6%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 8.0 5.0 49.1% 73.1% 44.4% 69.2% 30.8% 58.5% 36.4%
19 2003 7/8 2.9 3.1 60.9% 70.7% 52.0% 52.3% 43.5% 63.2% 40.5% 2004 3/3 3.0 3.0 63.1% 75.9% 37.7% 39.9% 14.3% 61.5% 29.3%
20 2004 51/54 4.6 3.2 60.9% 68.8% 51.7% 56.4% 44.9% 62.0% 36.8% 2005 8/8 6.1 2.3 57.1% 66.2% 48.8% 55.0% 26.3% 58.1% 34.5%
21 2005 66/66 4.2 2.1 61.7% 70.1% 53.4% 58.2% 41.8% 63.6% 38.9% 2006 15/15 6.3 1.3 62.8% 70.9% 52.0% 60.1% 37.9% 64.0% 34.1%
22 2006 26/26 4.3 2.9 64.0% 70.3% 50.9% 56.3% 40.2% 63.4% 36.6% 2007 34/34 12.4 2.5 60.2% 75.4% 52.3% 59.8% 38.5% 66.0% 34.1%
23 2007 53/57 4.1 1.8 68.2% 69.2% 55.0% 57.1% 43.3% 64.7% 38.2% 2008 16/17 9.4 2.1 61.3% 73.3% 51.1% 65.5% 37.9% 64.5% 32.8%
24 2008 65/68 6.1 2.5 64.2% 72.4% 54.0% 60.7% 41.9% 65.8% 35.8% 2009 20/20 7.5 1.6 60.8% 74.2% 54.4% 56.4% 38.6% 66.5% 31.5%
25 2009 56/57 5.3 2.8 61.7% 72.1% 52.1% 60.8% 42.2% 64.4% 36.1% 2010 5/5 8.4 2.8 56.2% 75.4% 49.5% 63.0% 34.7% 63.8% 32.3%
26 2010 36/36 5.0 3.1 56.7% 71.4% 50.8% 62.2% 44.2% 62.4% 37.6% 2011 8/8 10.5 3.1 58.6% 68.7% 50.2% 52.8% 27.1% 60.8% 29.8%
27 2011 39/39 5.1 3.1 59.7% 70.2% 50.2% 53.8% 40.2% 62.0% 35.9% 2012 6/6 4.7 2.8 55.1% 61.7% 41.1% 49.4% 45.8% 52.1% 20.7%
28 2012 27/27 5.1 2.4 61.2% 72.6% 54.5% 45.0% 40.1% 65.6% 36.1% 2013 5/5 9.6 2.8 62.4% 69.0% 48.7% 61.0% 40.8% 61.5% 35.4%
29 2013 1/1 5.0 2.0 68.8% 50.9% 36.0% 36.4% 66.7% 46.3% 31.5% 2014 8/8 7.1 3.9 58.2% 67.9% 46.4% 51.2% 34.5% 58.9% 29.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 3/3 5.3 3.0 59.3% 71.1% 43.1% 55.0% 33.3% 59.6% 28.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 6/6 6.3 1.7 62.1% 74.2% 56.7% 71.1% 24.7% 67.9% 30.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 2/2 5.0 2.0 65.2% 76.9% 44.3% 50.0% 22.2% 65.7% 26.6%
Career — 427/439 4.9 2.6 62.3% 70.7% 52.7% 57.4% 42.4% 63.8% 37.0% — 143/144 8.6 2.3 59.9% 72.1% 50.4% 58.3% 35.7% 63.4% 31.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Igor Andreev Frank Dancevic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1506 104.6 +0.04 -3.24 0.682 44.0% +22 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — +0.04
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1497 102.3 +2.47 -1.76 0.878 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06
19 2003 1565 122.4 +0.10 +2.20 1.099 51.5% +22 -32 — 52.6% +0.05 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.48 2004 1486 103.8 -0.52 -3.23 0.760 44.9% — — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.16
20 2004 1664 130.3 -0.34 -0.27 0.971 49.3% -116 +43 -35 49.3% -0.10 10–8 (56%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.52 2005 1473 101.3 -2.56 -1.42 0.825 46.8% +33 — — 27.8% -1.28 1–1 1–1 — +0.82
21 2005 1834 142.3 +0.89 +1.34 1.067 51.1% -112 -7 -145 53.6% +0.34 11–10 (52%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.95 2006 1558 120.1 +0.72 -1.24 0.948 48.9% -17 — +44 46.2% -0.31 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.23
22 2006 1761 134.8 +0.73 +0.41 1.000 49.9% -8 +8 — 49.3% +0.08 9–7 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.16 2007 1697 136.2 +2.37 -1.18 1.003 49.7% -6 — -95 48.4% -0.16 8–8 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.87
23 2007 1770 145.0 +1.90 +1.28 1.084 51.2% -68 +86 — 52.7% +0.22 10–10 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — -2.84 2008 1653 126.4 +1.17 -2.13 0.925 49.7% -7 — +11 44.7% -0.34 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.19
24 2008 1896 149.4 +2.70 +0.06 1.048 50.7% -27 -33 -267 57.0% +0.22 11–11 (50%) 20–15 (57%) — -0.72 2009 1699 134.9 +1.81 -2.41 0.940 48.8% +28 — +6 43.5% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.65
25 2009 1695 142.4 +0.78 -0.48 1.013 49.9% +11 +108 +29 49.0% -0.07 9–12 (43%) 10–14 (42%) — +3.05 2010 1663 112.5 -0.81 -0.02 0.891 48.2% — — +83 50.0% -0.42 0–2 3–0 (100%) — -0.03
26 2010 1701 143.1 -0.76 +0.75 0.999 50.2% -2 +101 — 47.7% -0.12 6–6 (50%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.32 2011 1696 122.6 -2.16 -3.36 0.759 45.7% +7 — — 36.4% -0.95 1–2 (33%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.72
27 2011 1689 134.9 -1.12 -1.08 0.947 48.9% +23 -16 -13 45.7% -0.24 6–12 (33%) 5–13 (28%) — -1.23 2012 1605 113.3 -3.12 -6.61 0.432 37.6% +71 — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.47
28 2012 1684 133.7 +1.84 -0.99 1.048 50.4% -45 +85 — 50.8% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 8–11 (42%) — -0.74 2013 1688 118.1 -0.19 -0.40 0.918 48.5% +6 — — 43.8% -0.44 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.09
29 2013 1587 89.3 -1.27 -3.47 0.586 39.2% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — +0.13 2014 1655 115.5 -2.84 -3.79 0.710 44.6% +4 — — 33.3% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.12
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1602 110.2 -0.20 -3.32 0.701 44.7% +41 — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.04
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1663 114.3 -0.72 -0.87 0.948 49.4% — — +100 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.11
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1658 105.5 -0.71 -1.04 0.776 46.9% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.57
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1596 104.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1590 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1577 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1930 144.8 +0.84 +0.23 1.023 50.3% -37 +42 -79 51.1% +0.06 75–83 (47%) 95–106 (47%) 98.7 -0.42 — 1772 127.2 +0.40 -2.03 0.872 47.8% +8 — +18 41.8% -0.57 23–32 (42%) 38–34 (53%) 98.0 +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.