H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Igor Andreev vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 3-2

Igor Andreev holds a 3–2 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2011 Sydney International round of 32 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Igor Andreev
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Jeremy Chardy
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Igor Andreev #79 6-2 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #44 Match data Jan 13, 2011* R32 Sydney International ATP 250 Hard
Igor Andreev #27 6-3 6-3 Jeremy Chardy #33 Match data Aug 1, 2009* QF Swiss Open Gstaad ATP 250 Clay
Jeremy Chardy #73 6-4 4-6 6-4 Igor Andreev #19 Match data Jan 16, 2009* R16 Sydney International ATP 250 Hard
Jeremy Chardy #81 3-6 7-5 6-4 Igor Andreev #19 Match data Oct 10, 2008* R16 Moscow International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Igor Andreev #23 7-6(3) 6-4 6-3 Jeremy Chardy #80 Match data Aug 28, 2008* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Igor Andreev #1,016 #18 2,490 1,929 223 216 50.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,967 293 304 49.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Igor Andreev Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2003 4–4 50.0% #88 1,565 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,546 0 0
20 2004 27–27 50.0% #50 1,664 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2005 37–29 56.1% #26 1,833 0 3 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,682 0 0
22 2006 13–13 50.0% #91 1,761 0 3 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,783 0 1
23 2007 31–26 54.4% #33 1,769 0 3 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,829 0 1
24 2008 40–28 58.8% #19 1,895 0 3 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,729 0 1
25 2009 27–30 47.4% #35 1,694 0 3 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,823 0 1
26 2010 17–19 47.2% #79 1,700 0 3 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,798 0 1
27 2011 15–24 38.5% #115 1,688 0 3 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2012 12–15 44.4% #110 1,684 0 3 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,897 0 1
29 2013 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,587 0 3 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,781 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,917 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2021 20–18 52.6% #107 1,794 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,733 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Igor Andreev Jeremy Chardy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2004 7 10 17 41.2% 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2005 10 13 23 43.5% 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 2008 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2006 12 8 20 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 17 17 34 50.0% 15 8 23 65.2% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
23 2007 9 9 18 50.0% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 14 15 29 48.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
24 2008 22 15 37 59.5% 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 4 10 14 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2009 14 19 33 42.4% 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 10 10 20 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2010 6 9 15 40.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 10 14 24 41.7% 8 9 17 47.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2011 7 11 18 38.9% 6 11 17 35.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 18 15 33 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
28 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 20 17 37 54.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2013 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 9 12 21 42.9% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 11 12 23 47.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 13 15 28 46.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 14 30 53.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 15 9 24 62.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 90 99 189 47.6% 108 92 200 54.0% 16 17 33 48.5% 9 8 17 52.9% — 164 171 335 49.0% 100 99 199 50.3% 29 34 63 46.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 427/439 of Igor Andreev's and 591/597 of Jeremy Chardy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Igor Andreev Jeremy Chardy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2003 7/8 2.9 3.1 60.9% 70.7% 52.0% 52.3% 43.5% 63.2% 40.5% 2006 4/4 3.8 5.5 60.9% 63.7% 43.3% 46.2% 47.8% 55.6% 42.3%
20 2004 51/54 4.6 3.2 60.9% 68.8% 51.7% 56.4% 44.9% 62.0% 36.8% 2007 3/3 7.7 3.0 57.6% 70.9% 47.9% 53.3% 32.6% 61.0% 31.3%
21 2005 66/66 4.2 2.1 61.7% 70.1% 53.4% 58.2% 41.8% 63.6% 38.9% 2008 19/19 10.2 5.2 62.0% 75.6% 51.4% 58.1% 39.3% 66.2% 32.6%
22 2006 26/26 4.3 2.9 64.0% 70.3% 50.9% 56.3% 40.2% 63.4% 36.6% 2009 62/62 8.6 3.3 58.9% 75.0% 53.0% 60.5% 39.4% 65.8% 34.5%
23 2007 53/57 4.1 1.8 68.2% 69.2% 55.0% 57.1% 43.3% 64.7% 38.2% 2010 52/52 8.3 3.5 57.7% 73.6% 49.1% 58.1% 38.6% 63.2% 35.9%
24 2008 65/68 6.1 2.5 64.2% 72.4% 54.0% 60.7% 41.9% 65.8% 35.8% 2011 26/26 6.7 4.3 57.2% 72.5% 44.6% 58.5% 37.2% 60.6% 33.1%
25 2009 56/57 5.3 2.8 61.7% 72.1% 52.1% 60.8% 42.2% 64.4% 36.1% 2012 44/44 7.4 4.1 56.7% 74.1% 50.2% 68.3% 39.9% 63.8% 37.0%
26 2010 36/36 5.0 3.1 56.7% 71.4% 50.8% 62.2% 44.2% 62.4% 37.6% 2013 47/47 8.3 5.2 60.9% 73.7% 49.2% 61.8% 37.3% 64.2% 34.8%
27 2011 39/39 5.1 3.1 59.7% 70.2% 50.2% 53.8% 40.2% 62.0% 35.9% 2014 60/60 8.5 4.0 58.9% 76.2% 51.5% 61.6% 40.3% 66.0% 35.5%
28 2012 27/27 5.1 2.4 61.2% 72.6% 54.5% 45.0% 40.1% 65.6% 36.1% 2015 54/54 7.5 4.3 62.0% 75.1% 52.9% 60.3% 39.9% 66.6% 35.6%
29 2013 1/1 5.0 2.0 68.8% 50.9% 36.0% 36.4% 66.7% 46.3% 31.5% 2016 38/38 8.1 5.1 59.0% 74.8% 49.8% 54.7% 45.4% 64.6% 37.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 37/38 7.8 4.3 63.2% 73.3% 48.9% 60.4% 37.1% 64.5% 36.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 45/45 8.5 4.2 63.1% 75.8% 49.3% 59.0% 36.1% 66.0% 34.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 55/55 9.2 4.0 62.6% 73.6% 48.6% 63.4% 39.5% 64.3% 34.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 7/7 8.0 5.7 60.7% 70.7% 43.6% 54.5% 24.6% 60.0% 34.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 33/38 6.1 4.1 62.1% 69.6% 48.7% 53.1% 47.3% 61.6% 33.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 5/5 3.0 8.2 63.6% 60.5% 38.6% 49.4% 54.0% 52.0% 30.9%
Career — 427/439 4.9 2.6 62.3% 70.7% 52.7% 57.4% 42.4% 63.8% 37.0% — 591/597 8.0 4.2 60.3% 74.0% 49.8% 60.0% 39.6% 64.4% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Igor Andreev Jeremy Chardy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1511 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1565 122.4 +0.10 +2.20 1.099 51.5% +22 -32 — 52.6% +0.05 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.48 2006 1547 109.6 -0.01 -0.38 0.953 48.3% — +18 — 54.5% +0.18 — 0–1 — -0.22
20 2004 1664 130.3 -0.34 -0.27 0.971 49.3% -116 +43 -35 49.3% -0.10 10–8 (56%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.52 2007 1563 110.4 -0.05 -2.80 0.804 46.1% — — — 14.3% -1.71 0–1 1–3 (25%) — +0.03
21 2005 1834 142.3 +0.89 +1.34 1.067 51.1% -112 -7 -145 53.6% +0.34 11–10 (52%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.95 2008 1682 127.9 +1.67 -2.03 0.965 49.3% -129 +32 — 45.6% +0.05 7–1 (88%) 5–12 (29%) — -0.36
22 2006 1761 134.8 +0.73 +0.41 1.000 49.9% -8 +8 — 49.3% +0.08 9–7 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.16 2009 1784 150.0 +2.44 -0.94 1.011 50.2% -58 +89 -176 51.0% +0.02 11–6 (65%) 17–14 (55%) — -2.59
23 2007 1770 145.0 +1.90 +1.28 1.084 51.2% -68 +86 — 52.7% +0.22 10–10 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — -2.84 2010 1829 151.4 +0.53 +0.22 0.977 49.5% -15 -14 -202 46.7% -0.29 6–6 (50%) 14–9 (61%) — -2.43
24 2008 1896 149.4 +2.70 +0.06 1.048 50.7% -27 -33 -267 57.0% +0.22 11–11 (50%) 20–15 (57%) — -0.72 2011 1730 130.1 -0.73 -3.31 0.842 47.4% +14 +22 — 34.4% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.53
25 2009 1695 142.4 +0.78 -0.48 1.013 49.9% +11 +108 +29 49.0% -0.07 9–12 (43%) 10–14 (42%) — +3.05 2012 1824 146.0 +0.74 -0.29 1.023 50.5% -35 -27 -210 52.8% +0.08 5–5 (50%) 10–9 (53%) — +1.81
26 2010 1701 143.1 -0.76 +0.75 0.999 50.2% -2 +101 — 47.7% -0.12 6–6 (50%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.32 2013 1798 148.4 +0.56 -0.91 0.973 49.5% -1 -38 -80 48.4% -0.05 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) — +2.11
27 2011 1689 134.9 -1.12 -1.08 0.947 48.9% +23 -16 -13 45.7% -0.24 6–12 (33%) 5–13 (28%) — -1.23 2014 1860 155.3 +2.21 +0.27 1.044 50.4% -17 -23 -33 52.6% +0.05 10–8 (56%) 20–20 (50%) — +0.64
28 2012 1684 133.7 +1.84 -0.99 1.048 50.4% -45 +85 — 50.8% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 8–11 (42%) — -0.74 2015 1897 159.6 +2.09 +0.92 1.065 50.9% -10 -37 — 50.4% +0.06 7–10 (41%) 13–16 (45%) — -0.92
29 2013 1587 89.3 -1.27 -3.47 0.586 39.2% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — +0.13 2016 1753 145.0 +0.78 +1.08 1.065 50.9% -18 +104 +1 47.4% +0.14 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) — +2.28
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1781 145.1 +0.66 +0.08 1.015 50.0% +8 +40 -55 42.2% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 7–7 (50%) — -1.26
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1830 155.4 +2.05 -0.91 1.008 50.0% -17 +15 -13 49.6% +0.03 9–4 (69%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.20
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1918 154.7 +0.56 -0.62 0.971 49.5% -20 -38 -152 49.0% +0.12 15–9 (63%) 14–26 (35%) — -2.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1786 126.6 -0.59 -0.34 0.856 47.3% +42 — — 30.0% -1.05 1–1 0–1 — -1.08
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1795 146.5 -0.75 -1.52 0.882 48.1% +76 -33 -95 46.9% -0.40 12–6 (67%) 15–8 (65%) — -2.92
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1733 104.8 -3.39 -1.83 0.643 42.4% — — — 21.4% -2.21 — — — -0.32
Career — 1930 144.8 +0.84 +0.23 1.023 50.3% -37 +42 -79 51.1% +0.06 75–83 (47%) 95–106 (47%) 98.7 -0.42 — 1967 154.7 +1.06 -0.45 0.988 49.7% -13 +5 -91 47.8% -0.12 100–82 (55%) 150–162 (48%) 102.9 -1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.