H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Igor Andreev holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2007 Sopot fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2007* | Sopot | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Igor Andreev | 7-5 6-4 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Igor Andreev | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |