H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Mischa Zverev H2H: 1-0
Igor Andreev holds a 1–0 lead over Mischa Zverev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2011 Gstaad third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2011* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Igor Andreev | 6-3 6-2 | Mischa Zverev | Match data |
| Oct 10, 2010 | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Mischa Zverev | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mischa Zverev | #1,373 | #25 | 1,664 | 2,007 | 134 | 199 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Mischa Zverev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #80 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #211 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #176 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #171 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,917 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #33 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |