H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Igor Kunitsyn vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Igor Kunitsyn holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Igor Kunitsyn leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Igor Kunitsyn won the 2011 Australian Open first round 6-7(1) 6-4 6-4 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Igor Kunitsyn | 6-7(1) 6-4 6-4 7-6(6) | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Kunitsyn | #1,093 | #35 | 1,562 | 1,755 | 87 | 149 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Igor Kunitsyn | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #129 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #47 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 16–30 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #100 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #71 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #162 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |