H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Igor Sijsling vs Ivan Navarro H2H: 0-1
Ivan Navarro holds a 1–0 lead over Igor Sijsling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ivan Navarro leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ivan Navarro won the 2008 Amersfoort third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 38
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Q2 | Grass | Igor Sijsling | 6-7(9) 6-1 7-5 | Ivan Navarro | Match data |
| Jul 17, 2008* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ivan Navarro | 6-3 6-1 | Igor Sijsling | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Sijsling | #854 | #52 | 910 | 1,794 | 44 | 84 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ivan Navarro | #1,929 | #67 | 1,108 | 1,627 | 35 | 65 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Sijsling | Ivan Navarro | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #525 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #138 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #68 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #128 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #124 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 9–25 | 26.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #74 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #145 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #127 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #177 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #193 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #231 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |