H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Igor Sijsling vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 1-2
Thiemo de Bakker holds a 2–1 lead over Igor Sijsling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Thiemo de Bakker leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thiemo de Bakker won the 2014 S Hertogenbosch third round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 38
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2014* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Thiemo de Bakker | 6-4 7-6(4) | Igor Sijsling | Match data |
| Aug 20, 2013* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Thiemo de Bakker | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Igor Sijsling | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2010* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Igor Sijsling | 4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | Thiemo de Bakker | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Sijsling | #854 | #52 | 910 | 1,794 | 44 | 84 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thiemo de Bakker | #1,382 | #40 | 1,010 | 1,853 | 54 | 80 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Sijsling | Thiemo de Bakker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #464 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #444 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #525 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #223 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #68 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #146 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #144 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 9–25 | 26.5% | #84 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #99 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #145 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #257 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #177 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |