H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ilie Nastase vs Hans Kary H2H: 3-0
Ilie Nastase holds a 3–0 lead over Hans Kary in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ilie Nastase leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Ilie Nastase won the 1975 Madrid fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 79
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 77
Left-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 1975* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ilie Nastase | 6-4 6-4 | Hans Kary | Match data |
| May 15, 1975* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ilie Nastase | 6-3 6-2 | Hans Kary | Match data |
| Mar 31, 1972* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Ilie Nastase | 6-3 6-2 6-2 | Hans Kary | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ilie Nastase | #1,075 | #1 | 0 | 2,260 | 859 | 331 | 72.2% | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 55 | 64 |
| Hans Kary | #627 | #54 | 0 | 1,772 | 150 | 216 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ilie Nastase | Hans Kary | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1968 | 41–14 | 74.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1970 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1969 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1970 | 60–20 | 75.0% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1971 | 73–13 | 84.9% | — | 2,079 | 0 | 14 | 1973 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #85 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1972 | 106–20 | 84.1% | — | 2,157 | 1 | 25 | 1974 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #81 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1973 | 118–17 | 87.4% | #1 | 2,208 | 2 | 41 | 1975 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #84 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 80–21 | 79.2% | #10 | 2,153 | 2 | 48 | 1976 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #70 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1975 | 91–21 | 81.2% | #7 | 2,170 | 2 | 54 | 1977 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #105 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1976 | 76–17 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,179 | 2 | 59 | 1978 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #192 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1977 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,092 | 2 | 62 | 1979 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1978 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #16 | 2,059 | 2 | 64 | 1980 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #143 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 1979 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #49 | 1,795 | 2 | 64 | 1981 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1980 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #77 | 1,740 | 2 | 64 | 1982 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,471 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 1981 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #74 | 1,730 | 2 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1982 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,633 | 2 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1983 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #118 | 1,595 | 2 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1984 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #202 | 1,574 | 2 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #431 | 1,535 | 2 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |