H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Ilie Nastase vs Nikola Pilic H2H: 6-2

Ilie Nastase holds a 6–2 lead over Nikola Pilic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Ilie Nastase leads 4–1 on clay and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ilie Nastase won the 1974 Hampton semifinal 7-5 6-2.

ROU Age 80 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
6 2
8 main-draw meetings
CRO Left-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ilie Nastase #1 7-5 6-2 Nikola Pilic #13 Match data Mar 15, 1974* SF Hampton ATP 250 Carpet
Ilie Nastase 6-3 2-6 6-2 Nikola Pilic Match data Feb 3, 1974* SF Richmond-Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Ilie Nastase #1 6-2 6-3 Nikola Pilic #13 Match data Oct 26, 1973* QF Madrid ATP 250 Clay
Ilie Nastase 7-5 6-3 Nikola Pilic Match data Aug 12, 1973* SF Cincinnati Open ATP 250 Clay
Ilie Nastase 6-3 6-3 6-0 Nikola Pilic Match data Jun 4, 1973* F Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Nikola Pilic 4-6 2-6 6-3 6-1 6-4 Ilie Nastase Match data Aug 8, 1970* SF Munich Open ATP 250 Clay
Ilie Nastase 4-6 1-6 6-1 7-5 6-2 Nikola Pilic Match data May 22, 1970* SF Italian Open ATP 250 Clay
Nikola Pilic 6-4 4-6 6-2 Ilie Nastase Match data Nov 30, 1969* F Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Ilie Nastase #1,075 #1 0 2,294 860 330 72.3% 2 0 4 2 59 67
Nikola Pilic #284 #12 0 1,950 301 249 54.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Ilie Nastase Nikola Pilic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1968 41–14 74.5% 1,772 0 3
22 1969 27–22 55.1% 1,835 0 5
23 1970 60–20 75.0% 1,966 0 7
24 1971 73–13 84.9% 2,091 0 15
25 1972 110–20 84.6% 2,173 1 27
26 1973 118–17 87.4% #1 2,212 2 43
27 1974 80–21 79.2% #10 2,155 2 50
28 1975 86–20 81.1% #7 2,174 2 56 1968 42–46 47.7% 1,636 0 0
29 1976 78–17 82.1% #3 2,202 2 62 1969 27–24 52.9% 1,767 0 1
30 1977 44–18 71.0% #9 2,101 2 65 1970 47–31 60.3% 1,887 0 2
31 1978 45–21 68.2% #16 2,058 2 67 1971 39–31 55.7% 1,842 0 3
32 1979 28–25 52.8% #49 1,796 2 67 1972 34–28 54.8% 1,891 0 4
33 1980 19–24 44.2% #77 1,741 2 67 1973 44–27 62.0% #15 1,840 0 4
34 1981 26–27 49.1% #74 1,725 2 67 1974 22–12 64.7% #32 1,904 0 4
35 1982 14–24 36.8% #86 1,633 2 67 1975 20–15 57.1% #50 1,871 0 5
36 1983 6–11 35.3% #118 1,594 2 67 1976 13–14 48.1% #68 1,751 0 5
37 1984 4–12 25.0% #202 1,574 2 67 1977 11–14 44.0% #82 1,697 0 5
38 1985 1–4 20.0% #431 1,535 2 67 1978 2–7 22.2% #284 1,620 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Ilie Nastase Nikola Pilic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1968 40 13 53 75.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1969 11 8 19 57.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1970 12 3 15 80.0% 34 9 43 79.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5%
24 1971 21 4 25 84.0% 35 5 40 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 14 2 16 87.5%
25 1972 29 7 36 80.6% 42 7 49 85.7% 16 2 18 88.9% 23 4 27 85.2%
26 1973 27 7 34 79.4% 59 3 62 95.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 22 4 26 84.6%
27 1974 4 2 6 66.7% 43 7 50 86.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 8 30 73.3%
28 1975 10 3 13 76.9% 65 13 78 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 1968 7 11 18 38.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 16 20 36 44.4%
29 1976 17 2 19 89.5% 16 4 20 80.0% 11 1 12 91.7% 34 10 44 77.3% 1969 6 4 10 60.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
30 1977 9 3 12 75.0% 16 5 21 76.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1970 5 6 11 45.5% 17 7 24 70.8% 20 11 31 64.5% 5 7 12 41.7%
31 1978 9 4 13 69.2% 15 4 19 78.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 17 11 28 60.7% 1971 13 7 20 65.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 9 10 19 47.4%
32 1979 11 9 20 55.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 1972 11 9 20 55.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 13 28 53.6%
33 1980 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 14 20 30.0% 1973 3 5 8 37.5% 26 13 39 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 11 8 19 57.9%
34 1981 13 9 22 59.1% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1974 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 18 8 26 69.2%
35 1982 6 8 14 42.9% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1975 14 7 21 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
36 1983 1 4 5 20.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
37 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 0 6 6 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
38 1985 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1978 2 7 9 22.2%
Career 191 86 277 69.0% 397 114 511 77.7% 76 31 107 71.0% 196 99 295 66.4% 48 46 94 51.1% 105 86 191 55.0% 64 37 101 63.4% 84 80 164 51.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Ilie Nastase Nikola Pilic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1968 1772 127.0 +103 68.8% +1.58 11–4 (73%) +2.43
22 1969 1835 129.0 -96 -35 -152 54.7% +0.34 9–10 (47%) 0–1 -2.11
23 1970 1967 149.4 +28 +67 -244 66.4% +1.24 14–6 (70%) -1.86
24 1971 2092 153.6 +129 +61 -360 71.7% +1.57 23–2 (92%) 8–10 (44%) 109.4 +0.96
25 1972 2173 157.1 +39 -11 -72 78.2% +1.92 19–8 (70%) 20–10 (67%) 105.3 +2.45
26 1973 2213 158.1 +29 +151 -183 78.4% +1.96 27–10 (73%) 18–5 (78%) 104.7 +1.08
27 1974 2156 159.6 -26 +191 -140 73.6% +1.63 16–9 (64%) 13–8 (62%) 95.8 -3.01
28 1975 2175 160.0 -32 +17 75.5% +1.84 17–7 (71%) 17–9 (65%) 104.7 -2.97 1968 1636 111.3 -151 -16 -31 47.3% -0.36 10–12 (45%) -1.40
29 1976 2202 168.0 +37 -12 -118 76.7% +1.74 14–5 (74%) 20–7 (74%) 107.5 -2.87 1969 1768 124.1 -72 -209 -64 53.7% +0.31 8–9 (47%) 1–0 -0.25
30 1977 2101 162.0 +62 +8 -7 63.4% +0.90 16–7 (70%) 11–4 (73%) 103.4 -3.16 1970 1888 148.2 -193 -47 +36 58.2% +0.88 14–13 (52%) 5–4 (56%) 105.5 -3.73
31 1978 2058 159.2 0 +39 +20 63.5% +0.77 12–11 (52%) 10–3 (77%) 98.0 -2.05 1971 1842 144.2 -18 -83 +111 58.7% +0.69 8–5 (62%) 12–13 (48%) 102.1 -3.57
32 1979 1796 149.5 +43 +211 53.7% +0.31 7–12 (37%) 2–9 (18%) 83.9 +1.47 1972 1892 147.9 -16 -78 +46 53.5% +0.29 7–7 (50%) 16–18 (47%) 98.7 -5.81
33 1980 1742 151.0 +2 +216 +338 46.2% +0.01 6–6 (50%) 4–8 (33%) 93.4 -0.92 1973 1841 145.7 -61 +43 +119 60.6% +0.80 10–8 (56%) 15–13 (54%) 98.1 -3.46
34 1981 1725 136.0 +65 +84 +186 50.0% +0.11 7–9 (44%) 9–7 (56%) 96.3 +0.26 1974 1905 139.1 -6 +73 56.0% +0.54 11–3 (79%) 5–8 (38%) 105.7 -1.39
35 1982 1634 132.2 +74 +87 44.8% -0.18 6–13 (32%) 6–8 (43%) 89.4 +1.39 1975 1872 141.0 -39 +45 57.6% +0.42 7–6 (54%) 4–3 (57%) 99.8 -0.41
36 1983 1595 122.4 +34 +99 40.0% -0.47 2–3 (40%) 1–7 (13%) 93.6 +0.83 1976 1752 126.4 +23 +27 +201 49.3% -0.20 4–3 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 95.6 -0.01
37 1984 1574 129.5 +46 +68 25.6% -1.79 3–2 (60%) 1–1 -1.97 1977 1698 136.2 +16 +18 +284 48.4% +0.05 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 96.7 -0.64
38 1985 1536 99.7 +60 23.1% -1.85 1–0 +0.29 1978 1620 117.9 +18 34.6% -0.54 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 95.2 +0.12
Career 2295 157.9 +30 +75 -98 67.2% +1.22 210–124 (63%) 140–97 (59%) 100.2 -0.84 1950 142.6 -68 -21 +43 54.6% +0.39 86–74 (54%) 63–73 (46%) 98.1 -3.78

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.