H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Ilie Nastase vs Tom Edlefsen H2H: 3-1
Ilie Nastase holds a 3–1 lead over Tom Edlefsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ilie Nastase leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Tom Edlefsen leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ilie Nastase won the 1972 Los Angeles Wct third round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 79
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 84
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 1972* | Los Angeles Wct | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ilie Nastase | 7-6 6-3 | Tom Edlefsen | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1972* | Hampton | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ilie Nastase | 6-2 6-1 | Tom Edlefsen | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1972* | Kansas City | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Tom Edlefsen | 3-6 6-3 7-6 | Ilie Nastase | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1971* | Macon | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Ilie Nastase | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Tom Edlefsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ilie Nastase | #1,075 | #1 | 0 | 2,260 | 859 | 331 | 72.2% | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 55 | 64 |
| Tom Edlefsen | #172 | #94 | 0 | 1,734 | 109 | 147 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ilie Nastase | Tom Edlefsen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 41–14 | 74.5% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 60–20 | 75.0% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 73–13 | 84.9% | — | 2,079 | 0 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 106–20 | 84.1% | — | 2,157 | 1 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 118–17 | 87.4% | #1 | 2,208 | 2 | 41 | 1968 | 19–22 | 46.3% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 80–21 | 79.2% | #10 | 2,153 | 2 | 48 | 1969 | 26–25 | 51.0% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1975 | 91–21 | 81.2% | #7 | 2,170 | 2 | 54 | 1970 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1976 | 76–17 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,179 | 2 | 59 | 1971 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1977 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,092 | 2 | 62 | 1972 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1978 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #16 | 2,059 | 2 | 64 | 1973 | 9–25 | 26.5% | #111 | 1,570 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1979 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #49 | 1,795 | 2 | 64 | 1974 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #118 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 1980 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #77 | 1,740 | 2 | 64 | 1975 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,507 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 1981 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #74 | 1,730 | 2 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1982 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #86 | 1,633 | 2 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1983 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #118 | 1,595 | 2 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1984 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #202 | 1,574 | 2 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #431 | 1,535 | 2 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |