H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Illya Marchenko vs Horacio Zeballos H2H: 1-0
Illya Marchenko holds a 1–0 lead over Horacio Zeballos in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Illya Marchenko leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Illya Marchenko won the 2010 Eastbourne fourth round 7-6(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Ukraine
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2010* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Illya Marchenko | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Illya Marchenko | #1,347 | #49 | 905 | 1,805 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Illya Marchenko | Horacio Zeballos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2009 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #81 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #229 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #94 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2021 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |