H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Illya Marchenko vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 2-1
Illya Marchenko holds a 2–1 lead over Ivan Dodig in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Illya Marchenko leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Illya Marchenko won the 2016 US Open first round 6-3 6-4 6-7(4) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Ukraine
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2016* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Illya Marchenko | 6-3 6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2011* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Ivan Dodig | 6-2 6-3 | Illya Marchenko | Match data |
| Feb 5, 2010* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Illya Marchenko | 6-4 6-2 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Illya Marchenko | #1,347 | #49 | 905 | 1,805 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Illya Marchenko | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2009 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #81 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #229 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #94 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2021 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |