H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Illya Marchenko vs Janko Tipsarevic H2H: 0-1
Janko Tipsarevic holds a 1–0 lead over Illya Marchenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janko Tipsarevic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janko Tipsarevic won the 2009 Moscow semifinal 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Ukraine
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 42
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2009* | Moscow | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Janko Tipsarevic | 6-1 6-4 | Illya Marchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Illya Marchenko | #1,347 | #49 | 905 | 1,805 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Janko Tipsarevic | #755 | #8 | 3,320 | 2,072 | 245 | 240 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Illya Marchenko | Janko Tipsarevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #117 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #81 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #229 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #49 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #94 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 49–24 | 67.1% | #9 | 2,006 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 48–26 | 64.9% | #9 | 1,972 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #36 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #410 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #144 | 1,748 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2021 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #105 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #219 | 1,665 | 0 | 4 |