H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Illya Marchenko vs Viktor Troicki H2H: 0-1
Viktor Troicki holds a 1–0 lead over Illya Marchenko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Viktor Troicki leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Viktor Troicki won the 2015 Zagreb third round 4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Ukraine
Age 38
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SRB
Age 40
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2015* | Zagreb | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Viktor Troicki | 4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(3) | Illya Marchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Illya Marchenko | #1,347 | #49 | 905 | 1,805 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Viktor Troicki | #1,433 | #12 | 2,015 | 2,008 | 268 | 256 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Illya Marchenko | Viktor Troicki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #211 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #120 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #127 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #81 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #229 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,803 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #28 | 1,935 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2013 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2015 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #94 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #75 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2016 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #101 | 1,903 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2017 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #22 | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #55 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #205 | 1,647 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2021 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,635 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #232 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |