H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Ilya Ivashka vs Pablo Andujar H2H: 1-1
Ilya Ivashka and Pablo Andujar are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pablo Andujar leads 1–0 on clay, while Ilya Ivashka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ilya Ivashka won the 2021 Sofia third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belarus
Age 32
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2021* | Sofia | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Ilya Ivashka | 6-4 6-3 | Pablo Andujar | Match data |
| Apr 12, 2018* | Marrakech | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pablo Andujar | 6-3 7-5 | Ilya Ivashka | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ilya Ivashka | #791 | #40 | 1,370 | 1,951 | 78 | 83 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pablo Andujar | #1,102 | #32 | 1,205 | 1,862 | 164 | 240 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ilya Ivashka | Pablo Andujar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #146 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #160 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #71 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #131 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #46 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #108 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #42 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2021 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #48 | 1,914 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 18–31 | 36.7% | #48 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2022 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #73 | 1,826 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2023 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #182 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #64 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #432 | 1,639 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,659 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #64 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #60 | 1,630 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #91 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #121 | 1,620 | 0 | 4 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,518 | 0 | 4 |